Sanos Clinic
Gandrup, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT05485922
The goal of this randomized, controlled crossover study was to assess the performance of a new micro-hole zone catheter compared to a conventional 2-eyelet catheter in 42 male intermittent catheter users.
The main objective of this study was to demonstrate superiority of the micro-hole zone catheter in terms of number of flow-stop episodes and residual volume at first flow-stop, with the catheterization performed by a health care professional in a hospital setting compared to a conventional two-eyelet catheter.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Gandrup, Denmark
The investigation was a single-centre, randomized, controlled crossover study including 42 male participants comparing the performance of two intermittent catheters (IC).
The study included an information visit (visit 0) and two test visits (visit 1 and 2) in which one catheterization with either the investigational device or the comparator device, according to a randomization scheme, was performed by a health care professional in a hospital setting assessing flow stop episodes, bladder emptying and hematuria. There were 4-14 days between each test visit (visit 1 and 2) and visit 0 and 1 could be held on the same day.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The investigational device was a urinary catheter for bladder drainage through the urethra. The product is for intermittent use.
The comparator device is a urinary catheter for bladder drainage through the urethra. The product is for intermittent use.
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure/catheterization
Flow-stops were measured with a pressure sensor, which is an electronic device used for monitoring the hydrostatic pressure at the outlet of an intermittent urinary catheter during emptying.
From a sensor curve, flow-stops were identified by two individually trained evaluators as a hydrostatic pressure peak coinciding with a urine flow-stop/ urine dripping (flowrate lower than 0,8 ml/sec).
Results from both evaluators were compared and in case of discrepancy a discussion was performed to extenuate discrepancies and agree on a final interpretation of the curves.
Time frame: When the first flow-stop appeared, the amount of voided urine was measured.
The residual urine at 1st flow-stop during catheterization (performed by a nurse) represents the volume of urine left in the bladder, the first time the urine stops running out of the catheter during bladder emptying.
Hence, the residual volume at 1st flow-stop was calculated as the total volume post catheterisation minus the volume at 1st flow-stop, derived from a catheterisation profile which was connected to a time-logged weighing [g].
Time frame: Immediately after catheterisation
Flow-stop episodes were determined as instances where the flow rate decreased to less than 0.8 mL/s for a period of at least two seconds. All episodes were detected by automatic thresholding, followed by manual inspection, where the intra-catheter pressure readings were used to support the assessment of a flow stop.
Time frame: When the first flow-stop appeared, the pressure at the drainage holes was measured
The intra-catheter pressure at the drainage holes, measured at 1st flow stop, was identified from a sensor curve.
Time frame: Immediately after catheterisation
Post-catheterisation volume measured with a bladder Scanner assessed by the average of 3 consecutive measurements [mL]
Coloplast A/S
Industry
A Randomized, Open-labelled, Crossover Study Confirming Performance of a Single-use Intermittent Micro-hole Zone Catheter in a Population of Adult Male Intermittent Catheter Users
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02463448
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02186041
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Aix-en-Provence, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03009968
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07070063
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial Details