Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04579614

Performance Feedback in Health Care

The Southeast Permanente Medical Group (TSPMG) at Kaiser Permanente Georgia provides performance feedback to its providers. The performance feedback designs can vary and change over time in terms of targets, summary statistics, included measures, and frequency of delivery. The TSPMG health services research group seek to compare different performance feedback designs to identify which are most effective at contributing to performance improvement.

The research team will randomly assign providers into different performance feedback conditions, as specified in the protocol. Providers will receive performance feedback through the standard mechanism in which it is conveyed by their supervisor.

The objective is to investigate how to design performance feedback for providers to best motivate and support them in improving performance along with existing strategic priorities for care delivery.

The reserach team will test alternative designs of performance feedback that vary on the following dimension:

1) targets for comparison of one's own performance

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kaiser Permanente Georgia Regional Offices

Atlanta, Georgia, 30305, United States

About this study

The Southeast Permanente Medical Group (TSPMG) provides performance feedback to its providers. The performance feedback designs can vary and change over time in terms of targets, summary statistics, included measures, and frequency of delivery. The TSPMG health services research team will seek to compare different performance feedback designs to identify which are most effective at contributing to performance improvement. .

The research team will randomly assign providers into different performance feedback conditions, as specified in the protocol. Providers will receive performance feedback through the standard mechanism in which it is conveyed by their supervisor.

The objective is to investigate how to design performance feedback for providers to best motivate and support them in improving performance along with existing strategic priorities for care delivery.

The research team will test alternative designs of performance feedback that vary on the following dimension:

  • targets for comparison of one's own performance

The research team will provide feedback on performance by measures that the organization already tracks internally and uses for performance improvement. These include a provider's utilization of opportunities to provide flu vaccinations.

The study will randomly assign different designs of feedback to providers. In order to understand which designs of feedback have the best effects on performance, the research team will test the following hypotheses:

  • Displaying the next-highest quartile will motivate improvement more than display of all quartiles.

Theory: The next-highest quartile will serve as an injunctive norm, or suggested target, to repeatedly lift an individual's performance to the suggested level.

  • The positive effect of displaying the next-highest quartile, relative to displaying all quartiles, will be most pronounced for initially low performers.

Theory: The next highest quartile averts upward social comparison to a much higher level of peer performance, which can be discouraging and so negatively affect performance

  • The positive effect of displaying the next-highest quartile, relative to displaying all quartiles, will diminish over time.

Theory: Individuals may become worn out as they see a target ratchet higher when their performance improves.

  • Displaying team relative performance along with individual relative performance will be more effective than displaying either type of information alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

A healthcare provider practicing at The Southeast Permanente Medical Group in a specialty for which the performance measure being studied is relevant.

Health care providers include:

Physicians, Nurse Practitioner, Certified Nurse Midwife, Psych Nurse Specialist, Optometrist, Podiatrist, and Physician Assistant

Exclusion criteria

Non-Physicians: Registered Nurses excluding nurse practitioners

Treatment and study plan

The Impact of Performance Feedback and Variable Goal Setting on Flu Vaccination Success Rates of Providers

Behavioral

A given provider will be involved in the study for a maximum of 6 months. This will involve, at the most frequent, the delivery of weekly performance feedback.

The performance feedback will be delivered using standard approaches already in place in the organization and there will not be a period of seeking out participants for enrollment.

Providers will receive performance feedback bi-weekly for the duration of the study period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Flu Vaccination Administered During Encounter

    Time frame: 10 Weeks

    Whether or not the providers succeeded in administering flu vaccination during flu vaccination opportunity

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente

Other

Collaborators

  • London School of Economics and Political Science

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 8, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 8, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.