University of Waterloo Centre for Contact Lens Research
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT01371552
The purpose of this study was to compare a new daily disposable, silicone hydrogel contact lens to marketed daily disposable, silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me17 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
Part 1 of the study involved bilateral wear of three different types of marketed contact lenses. Each type of lens was worn for three consecutive days of daily disposable wear. Participants had been previously identified as symptomatic lens wearers or asymptomatic lens wearers, based upon their responses to a screening questionnaire. Participants wore each lens type for as long as they were comfortable during the day, but lenses were removed before sleep. After completion of Part 1, participants began Part 2, which included dispensing of the investigational study lens for up to one week of bilateral wear, with a single follow-up visit at the end of that period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Investigational, silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis for 3 days in Part 1 and one week in Part 2.
Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis for 3 days in Part 1.
Other names: Clariti 1-DAY
Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis for 3 days in Part 1.
Other names: 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye
Time frame: Part 1: Day 2 at 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours
The participant recorded a number from 0 to 100 in response to the question, "How would you rate the comfort of your lenses over the last hour?" in which 0 = very poor and 100 = excellent. Comfort was assessed at 4 hours, 8 hours, and 12 hours, and the responses were averaged.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 3
The participant recorded a number from 0 to 100 in response to the question, "How would you rate the overall comfort of these lenses?" in which 0 = very poor and 100 = excellent. The end of wear questionnaire was completed at time of lens removal for that day.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 3
The participant recorded a number from 0 to 100 in response to the question, "How would you rate the overall quality of vision while wearing these lenses?" in which 0 = very poor and 100 = excellent. The end of wear questionnaire was completed at time of lens removal for that day.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 3
The participant recorded a number from 0 to 100 in response to the question, "How would you rate the overall ease of handling these lenses?" in which 0 = very difficult and 100 = very easy. The end of wear questionnaire was completed at time of lens removal for that day.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 2
The participant circled a number from 0 to 4 in response to the question, "Over the entire day while wearing these contact lenses, how often did your eyes feel dry?" in which 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = frequently, 4 = constantly. The end of wear questionnaire was completed at time of lens removal for that day.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 3
The participant circled a number from 1 to 5 in response to the question, "Overall, which lens do you prefer - the lens you wore today or your regular lenses?" in which 1 = strongly prefer my regular lenses, 2 = prefer my regular lenses, 3 = no preference, 4 = prefer test lens, 5 = strongly prefer test lens. The end of wear questionnaire was completed at time of lens removal for that day.
Time frame: Part 1: Day 1 at Dispense, Day 1 at 8 hours, Day 3 at 8 hours
Lens wettability was assessed by the investigator during slit-lamp examination and graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.25 steps, where 0 = excellent and 4 = severely reduced.
Time frame: Part 2: Day 7
The participant responded to 11 subjective, performance-related statements on a questionnaire by circling 1 = yes, 2 = no, or 3 = don't know.
CIBA VISION
Industry
Performance Evaluation of a New Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Lens (TUNGSTEN)
Acronym: TUNGSTEN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03334253
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07087665
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06700460
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00320593
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details