Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07261436

Performance Comparison of Large Language Models in TAP Block Ultrasound Interpretation

The goal of this study is to learn how accurately two artificial intelligence (AI) models, Gemini 2.5 Pro and ChatGPT-5.1, can interpret ultrasound videos of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block, a regional anesthesia technique used for pain control after surgery.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

How accurately can each AI model identify anatomical structures on TAP block ultrasound videos? Can the AI models correctly evaluate the spread of local anesthetic and determine whether the block is successful? How closely do the AI models' answers match the evaluations of expert anesthesiologists? No additional procedures will be performed on patients. TAP blocks will be done as part of routine clinical care, and the ultrasound videos will be recorded and de-identified.

Participants will not need to do anything extra for the study. Experienced anesthesiologists will review the videos and provide expert answers. The AI models will be given the same videos and asked the same questions. A second expert, who does not know which answers came from humans or AI, will compare all responses.

The results will help researchers understand whether advanced AI systems can safely support clinicians in interpreting ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia procedures and improve education and decision-making in anesthesia practice.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital

Istanbul, 34303, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Engin ihsan Turan

CONTACT

[email protected]

05382431114

About this study

This study aims to evaluate how two advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models, Gemini 2.5 Pro and ChatGPT-5.1, interpret ultrasound videos of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block procedures. TAP blocks are performed as part of routine clinical care by experienced anesthesiologists. The ultrasound videos recorded during these procedures serve as the data source for this study. No additional procedures or patient involvement are required beyond standard care.

Ultrasound Video Processing All ultrasound recordings will be fully de-identified by removing patient names, dates, and any other identifying information.

Gemini 2.5 Pro will receive original video files. ChatGPT-5.1 will receive high-resolution GIF segments generated from the same recordings.

Both models will be given identical structured prompts consisting of eight clinically relevant questions about anatomic structures, needle placement, local anesthetic spread, dermatomal effects, and potential safety concerns.

Expert Participation

Two anesthesiology experts will participate independently:

Expert A will review each ultrasound video and answer the same set of eight clinical questions. These answers will serve as the primary human clinical reference.

Expert B will independently evaluate all responses, those from Expert A, Gemini, and ChatGPT-5.1, after they have been anonymized and randomly ordered. Expert B will not know whether a response originated from an AI model or a human expert. Expert B will assess anatomical accuracy, clarity, clinical appropriateness, and overall content quality for each answer.

If Expert A and Expert B disagree on the interpretation or quality assessment of any response, a third expert (Expert C), who is also experienced in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, will independently review the relevant responses. Expert C's evaluation will be used to resolve discrepancies and establish the final consensus.

Data Collected

For each TAP block video, the following information will be recorded:

Ultrasound and procedural details. Patient demographic descriptors (age, sex, BMI, ASA classification), used only for general characterization of the sample.

AI-related performance features such as response completeness, relevance, confidence level, and response time.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-85 years
  • ASA I-III physical status
  • Undergoing elective surgery with a lateral TAP block performed as part of routine anesthesia care
  • Complete ultrasound-guided block procedure recorded on video
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Unsuccessful or incomplete TAP block procedure
  • Poor-quality ultrasound video (needle tip or anesthetic spread not visible)
  • Missing demographic or clinical data
  • Withdrawal of consent at any time

Treatment and study plan

Gemini 2.5 Pro Evaluation

Other

Analysis of de-identified ultrasound videos by the Gemini 2.5 Pro artificial intelligence model. The model receives standardized prompts and provides anatomical interpretation, block success assessment, and clinical suggestion outputs.

ChatGPT-5.1 Evaluation

Other

Analysis of de-identified ultrasound videos by the ChatGPT-5.1 artificial intelligence model. The model receives the same standardized questions and produces anatomical and clinical interpretations for comparison.

Primary outcomes

  1. Anatomical Interpretation Accuracy

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis

    For each ultrasound video, the ability of both AI models (ChatGPT-5.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro) to correctly identify key anatomical structures of the lateral TAP block (internal oblique, transversus abdominis, fascial plane, needle tip) will be evaluated. The accuracy of each model will be compared with the expert-defined reference answer.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Block Success Interpretation

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis.

    Assessment of whether each AI model correctly determines block success based on needle placement and local anesthetic spread, compared with expert reference evaluation.

  2. Needle Plane Evaluation

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis.

    Determination of whether AI models correctly assess the needle tip location and whether it is within the correct interfascial plane (IO-TA fascia), compared with the expert reference.

  3. Dermatomal Level Prediction

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis.

    Comparison of each AI model's predicted dermatomal coverage (e.g., T10-T12) with the expert-provided reference dermatomal level.

  4. Risk Awareness Assessment

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis.

    Evaluation of whether each AI model correctly identifies potential risks on ultrasound images (e.g., peritoneal proximity, vascular structures).

    0 = no risk awareness, 1 = partial, 2 = complete and appropriate risk identification.

  5. Recommendation Quality

    Time frame: At the time of video analysis.

    Assessment of the appropriateness of each model's suggestions (e.g., need for additional injection, repositioning) based on the ultrasound appearance.

    Qualitative scoring by expert evaluator (0-10).

  6. Agreement Between Experts

    Time frame: During expert evaluation phase.

    To evaluate whether Expert A and Expert B provide consistent judgments for each parameter; and to resolve discrepancies through Expert C when needed.

    Agreement / Disagreement resolved by third expert.

  7. AI Response Time

    Time frame: Captured automatically during model output.

    Time required for each AI model to generate answers to the eight standardized questions.

    Seconds (continuous variable).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Engin ihsan Turan, principal investigator

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905382431114

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Performance Comparison of Large Language Models in TAP Block Ultrasound Interpretation: A Double-Blind Prospective Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 3, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.