Sham Laser Therapy
Devicesham laser therapy for 4 consecutive weeks with a minimum of 3 sessions per week.
NCT Number: NCT06759935
DJO UK Ltd (ENOVIS) is conducting this study to assess the effectiveness of LightForce® Therapy Lasers on pain reduction in shoulder soft tissue inflammation. In detail this study will assess superiority of LightForce® Therapy Lasers combined with standard of care, represented by physiotherapy/exercise program compared to sham laser combined with standard of care (physiotherapy/exercise program) on pain reduction in subjects with shoulder soft tissue inflammation due to Impingement (Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS)) or Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy (RCT),. In addition, this study allows to collect post market clinical data on the safety and performance of LightForce® Therapy Lasers, when used, following the normal clinical practice, in accordance with its approved and CE marked intended use.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cabinet Attal, Serris, France
This clinical investigation is a post-market, International, multi center, prospective, randomized, sham controlled, single blind study to assess the effectiveness of LightForce® Therapy Lasers and to collect PMCF data on the safety and performance of LightForce® Therapy Lasers, when used in accordance with its approved labeling, to comply with Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) Article 61 and Part B of Annex XI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
sham laser therapy for 4 consecutive weeks with a minimum of 3 sessions per week.
laser therapy for 4 consecutive weeks with a minimum of 3 sessions per week.
physiotherapy/exercise protocol represents the standard of care (SOC) and the program includes Codman's pendulum exercise, range of motion (ROM) exercises, stretching and isometric strengthening exercises, for 4 consecutive weeks with a minimum of 3 sessions per week.
Time frame: 4 weeks after treatment start
Pain reduction measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (in a scale 0-100 mm, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst possible pain) after 4 weeks of treatment compared to pre-treatment (baseline) VAS
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 21 weeks
Proportion of patient experiencing an adverse event associated with device use
Time frame: 1,2,3,6, 9 and 12 weeks
Pain measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (in a scale 0-100 mm, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst possible pain) at 1,2,3,6, 9 and 12 weeks after treatment start to assess short-term and long-term pain management compared to baseline
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 and at 12 weeks
Shoulder pain and disability measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire (the score output is given as a percentace -from 0% to 100%- and the lower the percentage the better is the clinical outome, the higher the percentage the worse is the clinical outcome) performed at 2, 4, 6 and at 12 weeks after treatment start compared to baseline.
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start
Patient ratings of overall improvement, assessed by QoL (SF-12): The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. The SF-12 uses 12 items and scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning. SF-12 will be assessed at 2, 4, 6 weeks and at 12 weeks and compared to baseline
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start
Range of motion for shoulder both passive and active, pain free and at maximum ROM, in all the planes of motion, measured by a universal goniometer at2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start compared to baseline
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start
Functional test to assess shoulder pain onset at a certain degree of movement during flexion and pressure application (often used as a diagnositc tool of subacromial impingement) performed at 2,4, 6 and at 12 weeks after treatment start and compared to baseline
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start
Functional test where the patient elevates the extended arm with the palm facing upwards and against examiner's resistance, presence of pain can denote tendonitis (often used as diagnostic tool) and performed at 2,4, 6 and at 12 weeks after treatment start and compared to baseline
Time frame: 2, 4, 6 ans 12 weeks after treatment start
Functional testing of the arm with the thumb in 'thumbs up' and resistance provided by the examiner, weakness or pain would represent a positive test indicating a tear of the supraspinatus muscle or tendon, it will be performed at 2,4, 6 and at 12 weeks after treatment start and compared to baseline
Time frame: 18 weeks after treatment start
pain measured with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (in a scale 0-100 mm, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst possible pain) to assess post study pain
Time frame: 18 weeks after treatment start
Patients will be asked through a questionnaire whether any new treatment and in case which one (pharmacological, physiotherapic etc) was needed to manage shoulder pain after 12 weeks from treatment start
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
DJO UK Ltd
Industry
Randomized, Sham Controlled, Single Blind Study on the Performance and Safety of Photo Biomodulation Therapy (PBMT) With LightForce® Therapy Lasers on Shoulder Soft Tissue Inflammation Pain Reduction
Acronym: SHINE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03892603
Arthralgia, Joint Diseases
Québec, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03894761
Arthralgia, Joint Diseases
Çanakkale, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06095050
Arterial Occlusion, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06092502
Arthralgia, Joint Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details