Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15706, Spain
NCT Number: NCT05295537
Although the use of liver biopsy (LB) has decreased with the emerging non-invasive markers and techniques to evaluate liver fibrosis, histopathologic examination of liver tissue is necessary to confirm the type of liver injury. The aim of our study is to compare two methods for obtaining histological material from the liver: the percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) and the Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15706, Spain
LB remains the gold standard diagnostic test for most of the focal and parenchymal liver diseases. LB has an important diagnostic role in selected parenchymal liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis and infiltrative liver disorders, and in some cases, it helps clinicians to elucidate between overlapping diagnoses Traditionally, percutaneous (PLB) or transjugular approaches have been used to acquire liver samples. In recent tears EUS has emerged as an alternative and safe method to obtain liver samples, by puncturing the liver from the gastric or duodenal wall. In fact, EUS-guided LB has been shown equal or superior compared to PLB and transjugular approaches in retrospective series. EUS - LB has shown to produce excellent histological performance based on liver society guidelines requirements for parameters used in assessing histological yield which include the number of complete portal triads (CPT), sample size and total specimen length (TSL) with a low rate of adverse events EUS - LB has several advantages over the traditional liver biopsy methods: it provides simultaneous access to both liver lobes, enables real-time visualization avoiding the puncture of a large vessel and then reducing the rate of complications, it allows to perform a simultaneously endoscopic and endosonography evaluation of the pancreatobiliary system and it could decrease the level of the anxiety of patients (by the use of deep sedation) and then perhaps increasing the satisfaction with the procedure Despite the fact of the high diagnostic yield of EUS-LB in obtaining adequate samples from the liver and the low rate of adverse events reported with this method, there is an almost complete lack of randomized trials comparing EUS - LB with the traditional percutaneous route.
The aim of our study is to compare the quality of samples obtained and the diagnostic efficacy of EUS - LB against PLB in all patients that have an indication for a liver biopsy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Patients for whom a liver biopsy have been indicated.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous liver biopsy using a 16 gauge (G) Trucut needle.
EUS-guided liver biopsy using a 19 gauge (G) Franseen core EUS needle
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks
The quality of samples is based in the combination of a specimen length >20 mms and more than 10 complete portal triads (both conditions are required).
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks
Percentage of samples allowing an adequate histological diagnosis.
Time frame: At 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days
Adverse events evaluated according to the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon.
Time frame: 24 hours
Satisfaction survey that includes five points; four are questions scored from 1: bad to 5: excellent; and one is a dichotomic question (Yes/No). Survey will be performed 24 hours after the procedure by phone call.
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Other
Prospective, Randomized, Comparative, Non-inferiority, Multicentre Trial of Quality of Samples Obtained by Percutaneous Liver Biopsy Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Liver Biopsy
Acronym: PEREUS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03598192
Adult Disease, Digestive System Diseases
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT00488917
Critical Illness, Digestive System Diseases
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06319222
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03235414
Digestive System Diseases, Liver Diseases
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details