Center of Clinical Research Dalarna
Falun, 79182, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Maria Hårdstedt, MD/PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05227222
In swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE), there is a lack of knowledge regarding optimal treatment. The present study was designed to assess the benefit of treatment with positive expiratory pressure device (PEP-device) compared to spontaneous recovery in patients with SIPE without hypoxia in the out-of-hospital environment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Falun, 79182, Sweden
Location status: Recruiting
Maria Hårdstedt, MD/PhD
CONTACT
Swimming induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) is an unusual condition affecting otherwise healthy swimmers. SIPE is characterized by acute onset of dyspnea and cough, excessive sputum and occasionally hemoptysis when swimming in open water. The condition usually resolves spontaneously within 48 hours, but may result in serious illness and require emergency care. Case reports describe acute treatment with or without oxygen in combination with diuretics, beta-agonist-inhalation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Evidence for optimal treatment strategy is lacking. Oxygen treatment might not be appropriate for patients with SIPE presenting without hypoxia. It is unknown if positive airway pressure accelerates recovery in SIPE.
This study intends to determine whether treatment with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) applied by PEP-device accelerates increase of oxygen saturation compared to spontaneous recovery in patients presenting with SIPE without hypoxia. The aim is to treat patients on site without involving hospital care. We study a large cohort of approximately 12 000 swimmers during Vansbrosimningen, Sweden's biggest annual open water event with a yearly incidence of SIPE about 0,4%.
Adult patients clinically diagnosed with SIPE and oxygen saturation ≥92% are randomly assigned to 2 groups: (1) PEP-device for 20 minutes or (2) control group with spontaneous recovery without active treatment for 20 minutes. Assessment with outcome measures is taken 10 minutes after intervention/control. Primary endpoint: oxygen saturation (%) by pulse oxymetry.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PEP-device
Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by peripheral pulse oximetry
Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Change in peripheral oxygen saturation % (continuous variable) measured by pulse oximetry before and after treatment
Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation >95% after treatment" or no recovery, defined by "peripheral oxygen saturation ≤95% after treatment"
Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Bilateral or unilateral presence of two or more positive regions define positive interstitial syndrome
Time frame: after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions.
Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Four chest regions for both lungs are scanned by lung ultrasound; a positive region defined by the presence of three or more B-line artifacts. Assessment of the total number of positive regions. Change in absolute number of regions presenting B-lines on lung ultrasound before and after treatment
Time frame: change before versus after 20 min treatment followed by 10 min rest
Six different patient reported outcome measures assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS; min-max 0-10): cough, sputum, air hunger, breathing effort, tightness in chest, anxiousness. The patients will assess symptoms prior to and after treatment
Time frame: 1 hour
Admission to hospital within or after a maximal treatment time of 1 hour
Time frame: 1 hour
Total treatment time until oxygen saturation ≥96% is reached
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Dalarna County Council, Sweden
Other
Evaluation of Positive Expiratory Pressure Device (PEP-device) for Treatment of Swimming Induced Pulmonary Edema (SIPE) - a Randomized Single-blinded Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05391737
Heart Function Tests, Lung Diseases
Falun, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04307615
Lung Diseases, Pulmonary Edema
Falun, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT00815646
Immersion Pulmonary Edema (IPE), Lung Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05594485
Artificial Intelligence, Atelectasis
Havířov, Czechia
View Trial Details