Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, Poland
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07023094
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compares the analgesic effectiveness of two regional anesthesia techniques-Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block combined with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCB) versus Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB)-in pediatric patients undergoing hip surgery.
Interested in participating?
Request Info2 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Poznan, Poland
Location status: Recruiting
Orthopedic hip procedures in pediatric patients, including osteotomies, arthroscopic interventions, and reconstructive surgeries, often result in significant postoperative pain. Effective analgesia is critical for reducing surgical stress, accelerating rehabilitation, and minimizing opioid use and associated side effects. Regional anesthesia techniques have gained attention for their opioid-sparing effects and enhanced recovery profiles.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic effectiveness of two regional anesthetic approaches:
Lumbar and sacral erector spinae plane blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB) employ fascial plane techniques to deliver analgesia by diffusing local anesthetic around nerves innervating the hip region.
This trial aims to establish the optimal regional anesthesia technique and determine the clinical benefits of using dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants. The results will guide clinicians toward evidence-based analgesic protocols in pediatric orthopedic hip surgery, potentially reducing opioid-related complications and improving patient recovery outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
U-S guided PENG (0.4 mL/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine
LFCB (0.1 mL/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine
Lumbar ESPB (0.25ml/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine
Sacral ESPB (0.25ml/kg) with 0.2% ropivacaine
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Total opiate consumption after surgery
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Time after surgery when the patient needs opiate for the first time
Time frame: 4 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
Time frame: 8 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the NRS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt)
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery
neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery
platelet to lymphocyte ratio
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
platelet to lymphocyte ratio
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
platelet to lymphocyte ratio
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Other
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block (LFCB) Versus Lumbar and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks (L-ESPB and S-ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05361980
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06789367
Hip Disease, Hip Dislocation
Poznan, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06087549
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Poznan, Wielkopolska, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05446623
Hip Arthropathy, Hip Disease
Montauban, Tarn et Garonne, France
View Trial Details