Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07073209

PENG vs Femoral Block for Hip Fracture Analgesia

This study aims to compare the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with femoral block for hip fracture pain. Participants presenting to the hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture and consenting to analgesic block will receive either a PENG or femoral block. The choice of block will be dictated by a randomized monthly schedule, and all participants presenting during each four-week period will receive the designated block. A sub-group analysis will be performed to determine any difference in efficacy in participants with intracapsular versus extracapsular fractures.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Each year, 250,000 adults in the US and 1.6 million worldwide suffer hip fractures. Peripheral nerve blocks, including femoral blocks, administered soon after admission to patients presenting with hip fractures have been shown to produce clinically and statistically significant reductions in pain scores, opioid consumption, the incidence of confusional state, and the time to mobilization.

Historically, lower extremity blocks for hip fracture pain have targeted the femoral nerve. The PENG block is a relatively novel ultrasound guided block that was first described in 2018 as an alternative to the more traditional femoral block for regional hip analgesia in hip fracture patients. The PENG block targets articular branches of the obturator nerve and accessory obturator nerve, as well as branches of the femoral nerve, the combination of which richly innervate the anterior hip capsule. In a case series of 5 patients presenting to the Emergency Department with hip fracture pain, the PENG block was demonstrated to be an effective nerve block for hip analgesia by reducing the numerical rating scale pain scores by 7 points on a 10 point scale. A larger study compared the PENG block to placebo, also in hip fracture patients presenting to the Emergency Department, and demonstrated a significant decrease of 3 in the dynamic NRS pain score at 1 and 3 hours post-block. A Cochrane review in 2017 demonstrated femoral blocks to have a 3.4 point reduction in pain scores compared to placebo. No study to date has compared the PENG block to the femoral block for acute hip fracture pain.

This study aims to compare the PENG block with femoral block for acute hip fracture pain in patients upon presentation who have not undergone surgical repair. Patients presenting to the hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture and consenting to analgesic block will receive either a PENG or femoral block. The choice of block will be dictated by a randomized monthly schedule, and all patients presenting during each four-week period will receive the designated block. The primary outcome will be the change in NRS pain score from pre-block to one-hour post-block. Secondary outcomes will include NRS pain scores and opioid consumption for 24 hours post-block. A sub-group analysis will be performed to determine any difference in efficacy in patients with intracapsular versus extracapsular fractures.

This will be a pragmatic study with a multiple crossover cluster-controlled design. In this type of trial an intervention is implemented for all patients for a limited period of time and then substituted with the alternate intervention for a comparable amount of time. The order of intervention will be randomized. The repetition of the study periods, especially if conducted over a period of a year of more, has the effect of reducing time-dependent confounding from background improvements in healthcare and regression to the mean. The Hawthorne effect will be limited in this particular case because both of the interventions are already routinely and interchangeably used in our current practice for hip fracture analgesia. Research consent is usually waived in this type of trial design because the treatment received by subjects is identical to standard care and the exposure within a subject population is based only on time period rather than patient characteristics or consent.

As per current standard of care, all hip fracture patients admitted Monday - Friday, 7AM - 5PM, will be offered an analgesic lower extremity peripheral nerve block. Each month of the study will be randomized to either PENG or femoral block. All patients who consent to a block during each month will receive the designated block.

Data will be collected from the electronic medical record (EMR).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age.
  • ASA Classification 1-4
  • Documentation of a hip fracture diagnosis along with radiologic read indicating fracture location
  • Written, informed consent for analgesic peripheral block placement

Exclusion criteria

  • Altered mental status to the extent that it limits ability to report pain score
  • Patient or health care proxy refusal of analgesic nerve block
  • Allergy to study medications or contraindication to peripheral nerve block
  • Peri-prosthetic fracture
  • Any additional fractures in a patient with a unilateral hip fracture

Treatment and study plan

PENG Block Administration

Procedure

Policy for the PENG block administration:

30 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% 1:200,000 epinephrine Dexamethasone 4 mg%

While these drugs are administered to participants, the intervention under evaluation is the PENG Block anesthesia technique.

Femoral Block Administration

Procedure

Policy for the Femoral block administration:

30 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% 1:200,000 epinephrine Dexamethasone 4 mg

While these drugs are administered to participants, the intervention under evaluation is the Femoral Block anesthesia technique.

Bupivacaine , epinephrine Dexamethasone

Drug

30 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% 1:200,000 epinephrine Dexamethasone 4 mg%

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One Hour Post Block for all Subjects

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-hour post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

  2. Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One-Hour Post Block in Intracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-hour post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

  3. Mean Change in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score One-Hour Post Block in Extracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-hour post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block for all Subjects

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

  2. Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block in Intracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

  3. Mean NRS Pain Scores up to 24 Hours Post-block in Extracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measures the intensity of pain a subject experiences. where subjects rate their pain on a scale from zero to ten and each number corresponds to a different level of intensity. The lowest score 0 represents no pain and the highest score 10 represents the most intense feeling of pain.

  4. Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered for all Subjects

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block.

    Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686

  5. Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered in Intracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block.

    Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686

  6. Number of Oral Morphine Equivalents Administered in Extracapsular Hip Fractures

    Time frame: 0-24 hours post block

    Milligrams of oral morphine equivalent opioid consumption up to 24 hours post-block.

    Non-morphine opioids will be converted to an equivalent morphine dosage in milligrams for comparison across both block types. Oral morphine equivalent dosages are calculated using: Wen RY et al. A Comparison of Institutional Opioid Equianalgesia Tools: A National Study. J Palliat Med. 2022;25:1686

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mark Abdelmassih, B.S.

CONTACT

[email protected]

212-746-2774

Michele Steinkamp, BSN, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

212-746-2953

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Other

Collaborators

  • New York Presbyterian Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

PENG vs Femoral Block for Hip Fracture, A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
Registry last updated
May 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.