Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIV infusion
Other names: MK-3475,, KEYTRUDA®
NCT Number: NCT05116189
The primary objective is to compare pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by the investigator. The hypotheses are that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for participants with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors (Combined Positive Score [CPS] ≥1) and that pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab is superior to placebo plus paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab, with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator for all participants.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Westmead Hospital-Department of Gynaecological Oncology ( Site 0201), Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For bevacizumab treatment
IV infusion
Other names: MK-3475,, KEYTRUDA®
IV infusion
IV infusion
Other names: AVASTIN®, Zirabev
IV infusion
Other names: normal saline or dextrose
IV infusion
Other names: TAXOTERE®
Time frame: Up to ~38 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). The appearance of one or more lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was also considered PD. Per protocol, PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 is reported here. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to ~38 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). The appearance of one or more lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was also considered PD. PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator will be reported for all participants. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to ~38 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in participants with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 is reported here. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to ~38 months
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Per protocol, RECIST 1.1 was modified to allow up to 10 target lesions total (up to 5 per organ). The appearance of one or more lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in all participants is reported here. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to ~64 months
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. The OS will be reported for all participants.
Time frame: Up to ~64 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The number of participants who experience an AE will be reported.
Time frame: Up to ~64 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~64 months
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined score will be presented.
Time frame: Up to ~64 months
TTD is defined as the time from Baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30) score. Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and up to ~64 months
The EORTC QLQ-OV28 is an abdominal and gastrointestinal questionnaire (items 31-36). Participant responses to the question "Did you have abdominal pain ?" are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The change from baseline in abdominal and gastrointestinal symptoms (EORTC QLQ-LC28 Items 31-36) score will be presented. A lower score indicates a better outcome.
Time frame: Up to ~64 months
TTD is defined as the time from Baseline to the first onset of a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C28 Items 31-36) score. Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. The TTD, as assessed based on a ≥10-point negative change (decrease) from Baseline in GHS score, will be presented. A longer TTD indicates a better outcome.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Platinum-resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (KEYNOTE-B96/ENGOT-ov65)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04498117
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adnexal Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03872947
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05605535
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06915025
Adnexal Diseases, Carcinoma
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial Details