Pembrolizumab
Biological200 mg intravenous (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle.
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
NCT Number: NCT02252042
This is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®) versus standard treatment (methotrexate, docetaxel or cetuximab) for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pembrolizumab or Investigator's choice of standard treatment. The primary study hypothesis is that pembrolizumab treatment prolongs Overall Survival (OS) when compared to standard treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
200 mg intravenous (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle.
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
40 mg/m^2 IV (may be escalated to 60 mg/m^2 maximum dose) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 3-week cycle
75 mg/m^2 IV on Day 1 of each 3- week cycle
400 mg/m^2 IV loading dose on Day 1 and 250 mg/m^2 IV on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1, followed by 250 mg/m^2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each subsequent 3-week cycle.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all participants is presented. These initial OS results are based on a data cutoff date of 15-May-2017 with a database lock date of 04-Jun-2017. At the time of the database lock of 04-Jun-2017, there was incomplete collection of survival data for 12 participants.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The updated OS for all participants is presented. These OS results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS was presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review with or without confirmation. The ORR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review with or without confirmation. The ORR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 expression ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. DOR assessments were based on blinded central imaging vendor review with confirmation. The DOR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants who experienced a confirmed CR or PR is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. DOR assessments were based on blinded central imaging vendor review with confirmation. The DOR per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who experienced a confirmed CR or PR is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression based on assessments by the blinded central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The TTP per RECIST 1.1 for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
TTP was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression based on assessments by the blinded central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. The TTP per RECIST 1.1 for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1. The PFS per modified RECIST for all participants is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 2 years
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded central imaging vendor review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Modified RECIST is similar to RECIST 1.1 with the exception that a confirmation assessment of PD (>4 weeks after the initial PD) is required for participants who remain on treatment following a documented PD per RECIST 1.1. The PFS per modified RECIST for all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS is presented. These efficacy results were reported after complete acquisition of all outstanding survival data using a 15-May-2017 data cut-off date with a database update date of 13-Oct-2017.
Time frame: Up to approximately 33 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 33 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 30 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 30 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants with PD-L1 ≥1% CPS who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase III Randomized Trial of MK-3475 (Pembrolizumab) Versus Standard Treatment in Subjects With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06736379
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03138070
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01351103
BRAF Mutant Colorectal Cancer, Breast Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02083692
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details