Pembrolizumab
Biological400 mg IV infusion
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT03833167
This is a randomized, double-blind, study that compares pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with placebo given as adjuvant therapy in participants with high-risk locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (LA cSCC) that have undergone surgery with curative intent in combination with radiotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that pembrolizumab is superior to placebo in increasing recurrence free survival (RFS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME)-Oncology ( Site 0028), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
include, but are not limited to:
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
include, but are not limited to:
400 mg IV infusion
Other names: KEYTRUDA®, MK-3475
Placebo-matched IV infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 62 months
RFS as assessed by investigator was defined as the time between the date of randomization to the date of first local or regional recurrence of the index lesion, distant metastasis, or death due to any cause; whichever occurred first. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they were randomized. RFS as assessed by investigator is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 62 months
OS is the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they were randomized. OS is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 60 months
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall health status. The change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined score is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 60 months
Change from baseline in the score of EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5 is reported. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a cancer specific health-related quality-of life (QoL) questionnaire. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores meant a better level of function. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they were randomized. Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 62 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The percentage of participants who experience at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 19 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The percentage of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy Following Surgery and Radiation in Participants With High-risk Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LA cSCC) (KEYNOTE-630)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03336606
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06094829
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Bougival, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02664935
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Aberdeen, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02442375
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial Details