Lenvatinib
DrugLenvatinib 4 mg or 10 mg capsules at a total daily dose of 20 mg taken by mouth once per day.
Other names: E7080, MK-7902, LENVIMA®
NCT Number: NCT03884101
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib to chemotherapy in female participants with Stage III, IV, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. It is hypothesized that the combination of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib will be superior to chemotherapy for progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). It is also hypothesized that the combination of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib will be superior to chemotherapy for overall survival (OS).
As of Amendment 7 eligible participants on study completion will be able to transition to an extension study, if available, in which they can continue to receive pembrolizumab monotherapy, lenvatinib monotherapy, or a combination of both pembrolizumab and lenvatinib as received in the parent study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
IDIM Instituto de Diagnostico e Investigaciones Metabolicas ( Site 2607), Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Lenvatinib 4 mg or 10 mg capsules at a total daily dose of 20 mg taken by mouth once per day.
Other names: E7080, MK-7902, LENVIMA®
Pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenous (IV) infusion given on Day 1 of each cycle.
Other names: MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®
Paclitaxel 175 mg/m^2 IV infusion given on Day 1 of each cycle.
Other names: TAXOL®, ONXAL®
Carboplatin 10 mg/mL IV infusion at a total dose of are-under-the-curve (AUC) 6 (per Calvert's formula) given on Day 1 of each cycle.
Other names: PARAPLATIN®
Time frame: Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS of pMMR participants was presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 44 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. The PFS of all randomized participants was presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 51 months
OS was measured from the time of randomization up to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for pMMR participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 51 months
OS was measured from the time of randomization up to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were to be censored at the date of the last follow-up. The OS for all randomized participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 51 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of pMMR participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 51 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a CR: Disappearance of all target lesions or a PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of all randomized participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 18 weeks
The EORTC QLQ-C30 was developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. It contains 30 questions (items), 24 of which aggregate into nine multi-item scales representing various aspects, or dimensions, of quality of life (QoL): one global scale, five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, pain), and six additional single-symptom items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnoea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhoea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Individual items are scored on a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation; a higher score on the global and functional scales represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, and a higher score on the symptom scale represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and up to approximately 18 weeks
The EORTC QLQ-C30 was developed to assess the quality of life of patients with cancer. It contains 30 questions (items), 24 of which aggregate into nine multi-item scales representing various aspects, or dimensions, of QoL: one global scale, five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea, pain), and six additional single-symptom items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnoea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation and diarrhoea) and perceived financial impact of the disease. Individual items are scored on a 4-point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation; a higher score on the global and functional scales represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, and a higher score on the symptom scale represents a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 68 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated). Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced one or more AEs was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 68 months
An SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability, was a congenital birth defect, or was another important medical event. Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced one or more SAEs was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 68 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Immune-related AEs (irAEs) were AEs that were considered immune-mediated or potentially immune-mediated and are well-documented for pembrolizumab. These irAEs may occur shortly after the first dose or several months after the last dose of pembrolizumab treatment and may affect more than one body system simultaneously. Per protocol, the number of participants who experienced one or more irAEs was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.
Time frame: Up to approximately 68 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated). Per protocol, the number of participants who discontinued any study intervention (pembrolizumab and/or lenvatinib or paclitaxel and/or carboplatin) due to an AE was reported for the first course lenvatinib + pembrolizumab and paclitaxel + carboplatin arms.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Versus Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma (LEAP-001)
Acronym: LEAP-001
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05682950
Endometrial Neoplasms, Female Urogenital Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03935282
Behavior, Breast Diseases
Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03517449
Endometrial Neoplasms, Female Urogenital Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04865289
Endometrial Neoplasms, Female Urogenital Diseases
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial Details