Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01384084

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Plus Mini-Sling Versus Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Alone

The investigators have performed colposacropexy in women with uterovaginal prolapse for many years with satisfactory results.

This study was designed to compare whether, in the treatment of patients with uro-genital prolapse and urinary incontinence, the addition of a contemporary anti-incontinence procedure such as mini-sling is associated with a reduction of post-operative urinary incontinence (correction of pre-existent urinary incontinence and prevention of masked urinary incontinence).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients affected by III-IV grade urogenital urogenital prolapsed and urinary incontinence
  • Candidates for pelvic organ prolapsed repair using sacropexy
  • Prospectively randomized, using a predetermined computer-generated randomization code (4 blocks), to sacropexy plus anti-incontinence procedure (mini-sling) or sacropexy alone

Exclusion criteria

  • fertile patients
  • contraindication to major surgery
  • uterine cancer

Treatment and study plan

POP repair plus mini-sling

Procedure

For POP, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum.

A mini sling system will be used, placing a urethral low-tension tape anchored to the obturator muscles bilaterally at the level of tendinous arc. This mini-sling is a polypropylene monofilament mesh.

POP repair

Procedure

For POP repair, the anterior vaginal wall is dissected from the bladder to expose a vaginal wall area where the mesh will be attached. The procedure is repeated for the posterior vaginal wall. The sacral promontory surface is prepared and 1 non-reabsorbable sutures are placed into the sacral periosteum. The peritoneum is closed over the meshes.

Primary outcomes

  1. urinary incontinence

    Time frame: 12 months

    long-term relief of symptoms with anatomic correction of prolapse and subjective/objective correction of urinary incontinence

Secondary outcomes

  1. peri and post-operative complications

    Time frame: 1 month

    Operative time and morbidity according to Clavien-Dindo classification, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Of Perugia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

URINARY INCONTINENCE AND URO-GENITAL PROLAPSE: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE REPAIR PLUS MINI-SLING VERSUS PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE REPAIR ALONE

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jun 28, 2011
Registry last updated
May 20, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.