Pelvic Drains After Radical Hysterectomy in Treating Patients With Uterine, Cervical, or Vaginal Cancer

RATIONALE: The use of pelvic drains may help to prevent complications following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. It is not known whether receiving pelvic drains during surgery is more effective than receiving no pelvic drains during surgery in patients with uterine, cervical, or vaginal cancer.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine if the use of pelvic drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy is effective in treating patients with uterine, cervical, or vaginal cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Cervical Cancer Endometrial Cancer Endometrial Neoplasms Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Genital Diseases Genital Diseases, Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Infection Infections Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Perioperative/Postoperative Complications Postoperative Complications Urogenital Diseases Urogenital Neoplasms Uterine Cervical Diseases Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Uterine Diseases Uterine Neoplasms Vaginal Cancer Vaginal Diseases Vaginal Neoplasms

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna (Wien), Austria

About this study

OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate postoperative complications associated with the use or omission of pelvic drains following radical hysterectomy and node dissection that includes suturing of the vaginal cuff and no peritonealization.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, two-arm study. All patients receive radical hysterectomy (Rutledge-Piver II-III type) and pelvic lymphadenectomy, without pelvic and parietal peritonealization, with suturing of the vaginal cuff and closure of fascia and cutaneous layers; lumboaortic node dissection is optional. Patients are randomized during surgery to one of two arms: those on arm I receive pelvic drains and those on arm II do not. Those in arm I have drains applied in the pelvis, and lymph is collected by vaginal and/or transabdominal drains located in both retroperitoneal fossa. Drains are removed when the loss is less than 50 mL in 24 hours. Patients in both arms are followed at 2-3 months and 12 months after surgery.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 214 patients will be accrued for this study within 2 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven cervical, vaginal, or endometrial carcinoma for which abdominal radical hysterectomy (Rutledge-Piver II or III type) and pelvic node dissection is indicated The following are excluded: Extensive intraoperative retroperitoneal blood loss (more than 3000 mL) Excessive postsurgical hemorrhage or oozing of the wound area requiring postoperative drainage Concurrent urinary or bowel injury/deviation or surgical procedures for urinary incontinence (Burch etc.) Application of prophylactic abdominal mesh for subsequent radiotherapy

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: WHO 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified Other: Not pregnant

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: See Disease Characteristics

Treatment and study plan

infection prophylaxis and management

Procedure

management of therapy complications

Procedure

Surgical Procedure

Procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC

Network

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Phase III Trial for Evaluation of Usefulness of Pelvic Drains After Radical Hysterectomy and Node Dissection (RHND)

Important dates

Study start: 1998
Primary completion: 2000
First posted: Jul 22, 2004
Registry last updated: Jul 11, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed