PEGPH20 Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Compared With Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Participants With Stage IV Untreated Pancreatic Cancer

PFS: time from randomization until first occurrence of disease progression, either by central radiologic determination (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] version 1.1) or by clinical progression determined by Investigator, or death during treatment period from any cause. Radiological disease progression was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm); Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.

TE events were identified by applying the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) search strategy for 3 SMQs: TE arterial, TE venous, and TE vessel type unspecified and mixed arterial and venous. TE events were considered by the Sponsor to be adverse events (AEs) of special interest. All TE events, regardless of type of event, severity, or seriousness were reported. Participants with multiple events were counted only once. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

PFS was defined as time from randomization until first occurrence of disease progression, either by central radiologic determination (RECIST version 1.1) or by clinical progression determined by Investigator, or death during treatment period from any cause. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study thus far, nadir (this included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); Sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm; Appearance of one or more new lesions; Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Surviving participants without disease progression were censored for PFS analysis at the date of last evaluable post-baseline tumor assessment. Surviving participants without any post-baseline disease assessment were censored on Day 1. PFS was estimated using KM method. PFS was measured in HA-high and HA-low participants.

ORR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) regardless of confirmation, as assessed by RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Any pathological or non-pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. Participants who died or were lost to follow-up by the date of analysis data cutoff were censored at their last contact date.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 pharmacokinetic (PK) were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]).

Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 PK were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]).

Samples were analyzed for PEGPH20 concentration using a validated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Plasma samples to assess the potential effects of NAB+GEM on PEGH20 PK were collected in the PAG treatment group in the run-in phases (Run-in Phase 1: Original PEGPH20 formulation [3.5 mg/mL], and Run-in Phase 2: New PEGPH20 formulation [0.3 mg/mL]).