Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03511872

Peers Vs Professionals in Basic Life Support Training

An Evaluation of Peer-led basic life support training course compared with professional-led course in a limited resource environment; A randomized controlled trial

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Basic Life Support Training Course

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Peer training has been identified as a useful tool for delivering undergraduate training in basic life support (BLS) which is fundamental as an initial response in cases of emergency.

This study aimed to (1) Evaluate the efficacy of peer-led model in basic life support training among medical students in their first three years of study, compared to professional-led training and (2) To assess the efficacy of the course program and students' satisfaction of peer-led training.

A randomized controlled trial with blinded assessors will be conducted on 72 medical students from the pre-clinical years (1st to 3rd years in Syria) at Syrian Private University. Students will be randomly assigned to peer-led or to professional-led training group for one-day-course of basic life support skills.

Analysis will be done on students who underwent checklist based assessment using objective structured clinical examination design (OSCE) (practical assessment of BLS skills) and answered BLS knowledge checkpoint-questionnaire.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medical student from 1st, 2nd and third year at Syrian Private University.
  • Sign the consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • presence of any health problems preventing students from doing physical exercise.
  • any serious acute or chronic illness (infectious, psychological, physical).
  • scheduling conflict between the date of the BLS course and other faculty's classes or exams.
  • missing the course or the assessment for any reason.
  • refusing to sign the consent and having any prior experience in BLS skills (previously trained on BLS).

Treatment and study plan

Basic life support training

Other

A course design was made to be consistent with ERC guidelines with local modifications made by emergency professionals in duration, instructor-to-trainee ratio, course materials, methods to deliver these materials theoretically, and the type of the manikin used to practice CPR. One-day-course consisting of 75, 20, 20, 20 minutes for theoretical BLS, chocking, recovery position, the practical representation of BLS scenario respectively followed by 40-minute practical training on BLS skills for each subgroup. Both arms of the study follow the same timeline and no extra time is given to any group.

Same manikins were used for the training and the assessment. On the day of the experiment students in each arm are divided into 4 subgroups of maximum 9 students, each led by two trainers of BLS skills with a maximum ratio of 2 instructors to 9 students per group.

Primary outcomes

  1. BLS practical skills

    Time frame: Training and assessment were held at the same day of the experiment for both groups, 1) within 24 hours of providing the bls training course.

    A practical simulated scenario assessment using a checklist based evaluation in objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) design. The checklist is constructed in accordance to European resuscitation council (ERC) guideline. Students should perform each point correctly to pass the assessment (1- Safe approach, 2- call for help, 3- opening airway, 4-checking cardiopulmonary situation, 5- call ambulance, 6- CPR with effective depth, 7-rate and 8-position, 9-rescue breaths).

Secondary outcomes

  1. BLS knowledge questionnaire

    Time frame: Training and assessment were held at the same day of the experiment for both groups. 1) within 24 hours of providing the bls training course.

    a 20-item questionnaire with 3 checkpoints per item (60-point-scale) derived from ERC materials after testing the applicability of the questionnaire by a pilot study.

  2. Students' evaluation of BLS course survey

    Time frame: Training and assessment were held at the same day of the experiment for both groups. 1) within 24 hours of providing the bls training course.

    Students' reported outcomes using American Heart Association (AHA) survey of BLS course evaluation. This survey aims to investigate students' satisfaction and their opinions about the course.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Damascus University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Peers Versus Professional Training of Basic Life Support in Syria: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Apr 30, 2018
Registry last updated
May 1, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.