Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03734055

Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-management

The Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) study is a randomized, controlled in which 360 African American women with lupus will be recruited from the MUSC SLE database (60 mentors and 300 mentees). The peer mentoring intervention (patients will be matched with peer mentors who are considered competent in the management of their condition to provide modeling and reinforcement to participants) will occur by telephone for approximately 60 minutes every two weeks for 24 weeks. All participants will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (12 weeks post-enrollment), immediately following the intervention (24 weeks post-enrollment), and 12 months post-enrollment. The study will last 60 months with recruitment and enrollment over 48 months, 6 months for intervention delivery and 6 months for data analysis.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

About this study

The Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) study is a randomized controlled trial designed to examine whether a new, culturally tailored peer mentoring intervention improves disease self-management, indicators of disease activity, and health related quality of life (HRQOL) in African American women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). African American women with active SLE will be recruited as mentees and peer mentors. The investigators will recruit 300 mentees (150 mentored and 150 support group) and up to 60 mentors. As part of each wave, mentors (n=20) will be trained to deliver intervention content, prior to being paired with up to three mentees (n=50). The peer mentoring intervention will occur by twelve 60-minute telephone or video sessions carried out across the course of 24 weeks. In each wave, social support controls (n=50) will participate in a lupus support group created for this project, on the same schedule as peer mentoring sessions. Both conditions will be delivered via Webex, which has several advantages for this intervetion: 1) Sessions are easily accesible via phone or computer, allowing participants to choose their preferred interaction style; 2) A study coordinator can host the support groups and drop in/out for monitoring purposes; 3) There are video- or voice-call options for up to 25 paricipants at a time; and 4) This application ensures concordiant delivery methods across both arms of the study and the ability to document the frequency that voice and video options are used to adjust for participant choices in analyses. All participants (mentees, mentors, and social support controls) will be assessed using validated measures of patient reported outcomes and clinical indicators of disease activity at baseline, mid-intervention (3 months from baseline), immediately post-intervention (6 months from baseline), and 6 months post-intervention (12 months from baseline). For each wave, outcomes for mentees randomized to the mentored group will be compared with the outcomes of mentees randomized to the support group. A booster session will be incorporated for all participants (mentored and support group) at 3 months post-intervention to encourage retention.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • African American race/ethnicity
  • Female sex
  • Clinical diagnosis of SLE from a physician, according to ACR revised criteria for SLE
  • 18 years of age or older

Additional inclusion criteria for mentors include:

  • Disease duration > 2 years
  • Able to attend scheduled training sessions
  • Willing to provide one-on-one support to up to three African American women with SLE

Exclusion criteria

  • Mentees who participated in the pilot will be ineligible to participate in this study as a mentee, but could participate as a mentor if they meet other eligibility criteria.

Treatment and study plan

Peer Mentoring

Behavioral

Manualized peer mentorship program designed to provide modeling and reinforcement by peers (mentors) to other African American women with SLE (mentees) to encourage them to engage in activities that promote disease self-management.

Social Support Group

Behavioral

Social support controls will participate in a lupus support group created for this project, on the same schedule as peer mentoring sessions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction in Quality of Life as Assessed by the LUP-QOL (Lupus Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    Quality of life will be assessed by using The LUP-QOL (Lupus Quality of Life Questionnaire), which assesses areas of the participant's life that may be affected by lupus. The score ranges from 0-100. A score of '0' indicates the lowest quality of life, and a score of 100 indicates the best quality of life. The 'Overall Impact' field reported has a scale of 0-700. Higher values represent a better outcome.

  2. Change in Self-management

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) assesses an individual's knowledge, skill, and confidence for managing their health and healthcare. Individuals who measure high on this assessment typically understand the importance of taking a proactive role in managing their health and have the skills and confidence to do so. The PAM survey measures patients on a 0-100 scale and can segment patients into one of four activation levels along an empirically derived continuum, including "Believes Active Role Important", "Confidence and Knowledge to Take Action", "Taking Action", and "Staying Course Under Stress". Each activation level reveals insight into an array of health-related characteristics, including attitudes, motivators, behaviors, and outcomes. A high score represents a better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment Credibility

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    To assess for differences in outcome expectancy, a modified treatment credibility scale developed by Borkovec and Nau (1972) will be used. Four of the questions will be used for this study, with 10-point Likert scales. These include questions regarding how logical the treatment seems, how confident participants are about treatment, and their expectancy of success

  2. Satisfaction With Care: Validated General Scale

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    Satisfaction with Care will be measured with a previously validated general scale to measure satisfaction/dissatisfaction with health care. The 2-item scale ranges from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree).

  3. Disease Activity Measured by the Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months post-intervention

    The Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ) asks a single Patient Global Assessment (PGA) question about presence and severity of lupus activity over the past month, questions on 24 specific symptoms of disease activity and a single Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) asking the patient to rate disease activity on a scale of 0-10 over the past three months. The reported patient global assessment has a scale of 0-3. A higher score represents a better outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Registry information

Acronym: PALS

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 7, 2018
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.