Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy
DeviceUltrasound guided placement of gastrostomy tube using the PUMA-G Pediatric System
Other names: Ultrasound Gastrostomy, PUG, PUMA-G Pediatric Procedure
NCT Number: NCT05966311
The purpose of this research study is to test a new device called the PUMA-G Pediatric System. The research will measure if the device works well to safely aid doctors placing gastrostomy feeding tubes in children. The PUMA-G Pediatric System is an investigational device that uses ultrasound and magnets to guide insertion of a feeding tube.
Interested in participating?
Request Info0 year–21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Children's National Hospital, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
This is a multi-center, non-randomized, non-blinded feasibility study to evaluate the performance and safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy (PUG) technique in the pediatric population.
A common method for placing gastrostomy tubes currently uses ionizing radiation to aid doctors in procedural steps. Excess radiation usage may present long-term risks to pediatric patients. The PUG procedure, using the PUMA-G Pediatric System, primarily uses ultrasound to guide gastrostomy feeding tube placement.
Up to 40 patients will be enrolled in the study and receive the PUG procedure using the PUMA-G Pediatric System. Following the procedure, patients will be followed during their hospital admission until discharge or up to 30 days. Data will be collected to assess how safe the procedure was and if the procedure used less radiation. Study subjects will be compared to a matched, retrospective cohort of patients who received standard of care gastrostomy tube placement by Interventional Radiology.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ultrasound guided placement of gastrostomy tube using the PUMA-G Pediatric System
Other names: Ultrasound Gastrostomy, PUG, PUMA-G Pediatric Procedure
Time frame: up to 30 days
A composite rate of the quantity and severity of device related adverse events will be quantified (i.e. linking complications to what are caused by the device) in the post-procedural period including any additional medical/surgical interventions to resolve
Time frame: up to 30 days
The rate of other complications during the immediate procedural period between the PUG placement and a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method
Time frame: up to 30 days
The quantity of ionizing radiation used during the PUG procedure will be compared to a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using the standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method. Quantities of procedural ionizing radiation will be measured by total fluoroscopic time (min).
Time frame: up to 30 days
The quantity of ionizing radiation used during the PUG procedure will be compared to a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using the standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method. Quantities of procedural ionizing radiation will be measured by dose area product (microGy-m2).
Time frame: up to 30 days
The quantity of ionizing radiation used during the PUG procedure will be compared to a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using the standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method. Quantities of procedural ionizing radiation will be measured by skin dose (mGy).
Time frame: up to 30 days
The quantity of anesthesia/sedative medications used during the PUG procedure will be compared to a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using the standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method. Medications and total procedural dosages will be quantified.
Time frame: up to 30 days
The quantity of antibiotic medications used during the PUG procedure and in the post-procedural timeframe will be compared to a historical cohort of matched controls who underwent gastrostomy placement using the standard of care Interventional Radiologic gastrostomy tube placement method. Medication and dosage will be measured.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jack Kent, MPH
CONTACT
Steven Tropello, MD
CONTACT
CoapTech
Industry
A Multi-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety and of the Pediatric PUMA-G System for Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05618392
Gastrostomy, Gastrostomy Complications
Valence, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04804631
Bone Marrow Disease, Bone Marrow Diseases
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06361498
Gastrostomy
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06464978
Anastomotic Leak, Anastomotic Leakage
Nanchong, Sichuan, China
View Trial Details