Conservative (non-surgical) treatment
ProcedureSpica cast Traction Traction and spica cast
NCT Number: NCT03211546
Prospective data collection and evaluation of complete data sets will be performed in the course of routine clinical care of a cohort of consecutive patients (children up to 16 years old) presenting with an isolated femur shaft fracture. Data will be collected during follow-up visits at 3 to 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months, with additional follow-up visits as needed or dictated by individual practice. Final follow-up will be at 24 months, unless a patient requires additional follow-up or another intervention to address an unfavorable outcome (e.g. malalignment, nonunion, limb length discrepancy) noted at the 24 month follow-up visit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 16 year
All sexes
Observational
Medical University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria
There is limited evidence about the comparative effectiveness of different treatments for pediatric femur fractures. The most common method used for isolated femur shaft fractures of children older than 5 years of age is elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN). It is thought to be the ideal indication for children up to the age of 10 to 12 and it is the most commonly employed method of internal fixation in this age group, but other treatments include external fixation, plating, other forms of flexible or rigid intramedullary nailing and non-operative options such as spica casts or traction. In children under the age of 5 non-operative methods are believed to work well with few complications. Imperfect alignment is more acceptable because of the tremendous remodelling potential in young growing children. Internal fixation is believed to be unnecessary as it is more invasive, with some risk of complications and likely need for a second surgical procedure to remove it. Biomechanical properties are different in this age group. Consequently, operative treatment of these fractures is generally not recommended in children under the age of 3 according to the German guidelines (www.awmf.org), not under the age of 5 in the American guidelines (www.aaos.org); and in Great Britain, surgical management in preschool children is restricted to polytrauma and complex injuries (www.nice.org.uk).
Despite these recommendations and the general acceptance of non-operative treatment for younger children , a survey of clinical practice in Germany revealed that 50% of children under the age of 3 years are treated with ESIN, because some surgeons believe that patients seem less comfortable when treated with traction or spica casting and might experience a higher rate of loss of reduction. Consequently, the use of ESIN for fractures in preschool children has become more prevalent in the last years.
Similarly, there is wide variation in the preferred management of femoral shaft fractures in older children, with little evidence about the comparative effectiveness of different treatments for pediatric femur fractures. There is an imperative to collect prospective data to generate higher quality evidence.
The purpose of this proposed registry is to collect the clinical outcomes (fracture healing & patient reported outcomes and complications) of the treatment of isolated femur shaft fractures in children up to skeletal maturity. Additionally, health economic aspects will be evaluated to give possible recommendations from a health economic perspective.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Spica cast Traction Traction and spica cast
Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing (ESIN) Conventional locking intramedullary nail Plating External fixation
Time frame: up to 24 months
Mechanical and anatomical axes
Time frame: up to 24 months
ROM of the hip (flexion/extension, internal/external rotation and abduction/adduction) and the knee (flexion/extension)
Time frame: up to 24 months
Varus/valgus malalignment, flexion/extension deficit or rotational malalignment will be evaluated compared to the contralateral (healthy) leg
Time frame: up to 24 months
The Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) will be measured using the standing blocks method
Time frame: up to 24 months
The quadriceps strength will be measure using the manual muscle testing.
Time frame: up to 24 months
ime to full weight-bearing, time to full activity, and time to return to kindergarten/school.
Time frame: up to 24 months
Patient Reported Outcomes of Fracture Healing- Lower Limb
Time frame: up to 24 months
EQ-5D-Y version proxy 1
AO Innovation Translation Center
Other
A Prospective Multicenter Observational Registry for Femoral Shaft Fractures in Children up to 16 Years of Age
Acronym: PedFemFx
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05362864
Femoral Fractures, Femoral Shaft Fracture
Douai, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03251534
Femoral Shaft Fracture
Grenoble, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00471913
Femoral Shaft Fracture, Fractures, Bone
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01190696
Femoral Shaft Fracture
Isfahan, Iran
View Trial Details