Parks surgery
ProcedureParks surgery
NCT Number: NCT05607927
Chronic radiation-induced injury (CRII) is a common complication after radiation therapy for pelvic malignancies. Resection surgery could be an optimal surgical approach when CRII is complicated by late complications. However, because of high incidence of postoperative complications like anastomotic leakage rate and mortality, doctors try to avoid performing surgical resection. In addition, there is sparse agreement on the types of surgery.
Previous study proved that anastomosis with at least one end of bowel without radiation damage can greatly reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage rate and mortality. And in Bacon surgery, primary anastomosis is not performed, and the anastomotic tension markedly reduced and the blood supply of anastomosis can be judged intuitively to improve the quality of anastomosis in the second stage of intestinal anastomosis to decrease the anastomotic leakage rate. Combining the advantages of proximally extended resection and two-stage anastomosis could minimize potential complications and maximize the therapeutic efficacy in theory, and a small sample prospective clinical study by the investigator have already preliminarily confirmed it. The investigator has also preliminarily proved that Parks surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of late complications of CRII.
Therefore, this study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of PE-Bacon surgery with Parks surgery as a control, in order to select more optimal surgical methods and provide a high-level evidence-based medical basis for patients with late complications of CRII.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Chronic radiation-induced injury (CRII) is a common complication after radiation therapy for pelvic malignancies. Compared with diversion surgery, resection surgery removes the damaged tissue completely to avoid the risks of recurrence and improve patients' outcome. Hence, resection surgery could be an optimal surgical approach when CRII is complicated by late complications. However, because of high incidence of postoperative complications like anastomotic leakage rate and mortality, doctors try to avoid performing surgical resection. In addition, there is sparse agreement on the types of surgery.
With the advances of surgical techniques and perioperative care, the morbidity and mortality of resection surgery has been decreased significantly. In addition, previous study proved that anastomosis with at least one end of bowel without radiation damage can greatly reduce postoperative anastomotic leakage rate and mortality. And in Bacon surgery, primary anastomosis is not performed, and the anastomotic tension markedly reduced and the blood supply of anastomosis can be judged intuitively to improve the quality of anastomosis in the second stage of intestinal anastomosis to decrease the anastomotic leakage rate. Combining the advantages of proximally extended resection and two-stage anastomosis could minimize potential complications and maximize the therapeutic efficacy in theory, and a small sample prospective clinical study by the investigator have already preliminarily confirmed it. And the investigator has also preliminarily proved that Parks surgery is safe and feasible for the treatment of late complications of CRII.
Therefore, this study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of PE-Bacon surgery with Parks surgery as a control, in order to select more optimal surgical methods and provide a high-level evidence-based medical basis for patients with late complications of CRII.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Parks surgery
PE-Bacon surgery
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Ostomy reversal rate within 1 year after surgery
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic leakage within 6 months after surgery
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Ostomy reversal rate within 2 years after surgery
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
Ostomy reversal rate within 3 years after surgery
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic leakage within 1 year after surgery
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic leakage within 2 years after surgery
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic leakage within 3 years after surgery
Time frame: 6 months after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic stricture within 6 months after surgery
Time frame: 1 year after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic stricture within 1 year after surgery
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic stricture within 2 years after surgery
Time frame: 3 years after surgery
Incidence of anastomotic stricture within 3 years after surgery
Time frame: 1 year after ostomy reversal
Incidence of severe intestinal dysfunction at 1 year after ostomy reversal
Time frame: 2 years after ostomy reversal
Incidence of severe intestinal dysfunction at 2 years after ostomy reversal
Time frame: 3 years after ostomy reversal
Incidence of severe intestinal dysfunction at 3 years after ostomy reversal
Time frame: 1 year after ostomy reversal
Quality of life at 1 year after ostomy reversal
Time frame: 2 years after ostomy reversal
Quality of life at 2 years after ostomy reversal
Time frame: 3 years after ostomy reversal
Quality of life at 3 years after ostomy reversal
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Other
Laparoscopic Proximally Extended Colorectal Resection With Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Late Complications of Chronic Radiation-induced Rectal Injury: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trail
Acronym: PE-Bacon
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.