Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
DeviceAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a cervical plate and bone graft in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1
NCT Number: NCT00578812
The PCM Cervical Disc was studied in a prospective, multicenter, randomized FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial conducted in the United States to evaluate longitudinal outcomes over 2 years comparatively between the PCM Cervical Disc and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate. Patients with adjacent or non-adjacent prior fusion were allowed. A total of 416 patients with a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C7-T1 were enrolled in the clinical trial and 403 were treated. Patients were randomly assigned to be treated either with the PCM Cervical Disc or ACDF.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Spine Group Beverly Hills, Beverly Hills, California, United States
The PCM Cervical Disc was studied in a prospective, multicenter, randomized FDA-approved investigational device exemption (IDE) clinical trial conducted in the United States to evaluate longitudinal outcomes over 2 years comparatively between the PCM Cervical Disc and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate. Patients with adjacent or non-adjacent prior fusion were allowed. A total of 416 patients with a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C7-T1 were enrolled in the clinical trial and 403 were treated. Patients were randomly assigned to be treated either with the PCM Cervical Disc or ACDF.
Patients were evaluated before surgery, during the operation, immediately after surgery, and then at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months, and yearly after surgery. The patients were recommended to have a physical therapy program for non-impact exercises and active range of motion exercises after surgery. Patients were also instructed to avoid repetitive cervical flexion and extension bending and lateral bending and rotation for 6 weeks following surgery.
The safety of the PCM Cervical Disc was assessed by comparing the adverse events, any additional surgical procedures, and the neurological outcomes to those in the ACDF control group. The effectiveness of the PCM Cervical Disc was assessed by evaluating patients' pain and function outcomes using a standard questionnaire, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the severity of neck and arm pain based on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessment, quality of life using a standard questionnaire, the Short Form-36 (SF-36), as well as a patient satisfaction questionnaire compared to the ACDF control group. In addition, the patients were evaluated using radiographic evaluations, including spinal range of motion, spinal disc height, device displacement or migration, spinal fusion status, and heterotopic ossification (abnormal bone formation).
The primary endpoint of the IDE trial was a composite measure termed "overall success," which was evaluated at 24 months postoperatively, and was defined as at least 20% improvement in neck disability index (NDI) from preoperative score; absence of reoperation, revision, or removal; maintenance or improvement in neurological status; and absence of radiographic or major complications during the 24-month follow-up period.
On October 26, 2012, the FDA granted Premarket Approval (PMA) for the PCM Cervical Disc. PCM Cervical Disc is indicated for use in skeletally mature patients for reconstruction of a degenerated cervical disc at one level from C3-C4 to C6-C7 following single-level discectomy for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit), with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to a single-level abnormality localized to the disc space, and manifested by at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height as compared to adjacent levels.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a cervical plate and bone graft in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1
PCM Cervical Disc replacement in patients with degenerated cervical discs and neurological symptoms at one level from C3 to T1
Time frame: 24 Months
Individual patient overall success defined as ≥20% improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) from preoperative score, no device failures requiring revision, reoperation or removal, and the absence of radiographic or major complications during the 24-month follow-up period.
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement of ≥20mm in neck pain at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean neck pain at 24 months on a 0-100 mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement of ≥20mm in worst arm pain at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean worst arm pain at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement in NDI of ≥20% at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement in NDI of ≥15-points at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean NDI at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement of ≥15% on SF-36 PCS at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean SF-36 PCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Improvement of ≥15% on the SF-36 MCS at 24 months compared to baseline.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean SF-36 MCS at 24 months on a 0-100 scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean dysphagia for swallowing at 24 months on a 0-100mm Visual Analog Scale (lower value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean Patient Satisfaction at 24 months on a 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (higher value is better).
Time frame: 24 Months
Maintenance or improvement in Nurick's Classification from baseline to 24 months. Nurick's classification is a six-point scale, graded 0 to 5. A grade of 0 indicates no symptoms at all, while a grade of 5 is a bed or chair-bound patient. A patient "maintained" if their Nurick classification grade remained the same or "improved" if it decreased from baseline to 24 months.
Time frame: 24 Months
Mean flexion/extension range of motion at operative level at 24 months. The operative level is defined as the cervical spinal level at which the surgical procedure was performed.
NuVasive
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing PCM® Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: 2 Year Results From the US IDE Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00637156
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00437190
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01905930
Central Nervous System Diseases, Myelopathy
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03127826
Back Pain, Intervertebral Disc Disorder
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial Details