Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03375515

PCA vs Non-PCA Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration for Severe Cancer Pain

A large number of studies have shown that patients feel more satisfied with hydromorphone in the pain management. and a systematic review found that hydromorphone may be better suited than morphine for titration of acute analgesia. However, current researches on intravenous opioid titration for cancer pain such as hydromorphone are relatively insufficient in China. Therefore, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of comparing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus non-PCA intravenous hydromorphone titration for severe cancer pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Rongbo Lin

Fuzhou, Fujian, 350014, China

About this study

The opioid dose for individual with cancer pain to provide adequate relief of pain with an acceptable degree of side effects is variable. Opioid titration is a process to obtain the tailored dose. Conventional titration is administered by a clinician or nurse. PCA is that patients control cancer pain by self-administration of intravenous opioids using programmable pump. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of PCA titration versus conventional titration intravenously for severe cancer pain (10-point numerical rating scale, NRS ≥ 7). Injectable Hydromorphone was selected as pharmaceutical analgesics, which works as well as morphine and oxycodone and had similar side effects.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • With written informed consent signed voluntarily by patients themselves.
  • Cancer patients aged 18-70 years old.
  • Patients with cancer pain more than or equal to NRS 7 during previous 24 hours.
  • Patients who will not be treated with radiotherapy within 7 days prior to randomization and during study.
  • Patients who need chemotherapy, long term administration of hormone, targeted therapy, or bisphosphonates therapy should undergo a stable anti- tumor therapy prior to randomization.
  • Patients or his/her caregivers who are able to fill out the questionnaire forms.
  • Ability to correctly understand and cooperate with medication guidance of doctors and nurses.
  • Without a history of anaphylaxis of narcotic drugs.
  • Without psychiatric problems.
  • ECOG performance status ≤3.
  • Not participated in another drug clinical trial within one month before inclusion(including hydromorphone).

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with non-cancer pain or unexplained pain.
  • Patients suffered with post-op pain.
  • Patients having paralytic ileus.
  • Patients who have hypersensitivity to hydromorphone.
  • There are abnormal lab results, with obvious clinical significance, such as the creatinine ≥ 2 fold of upper limit of normal value, or ALT or AST ≥ 2.5 fold of upper limit of normal value (≥ 5 fold,to the patients with liver metastasis or primary liver cancer), or liver function of Child C grade.
  • Patients having a incoercible Nausea and vomiting.
  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) was administrated two week before randomization.
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating,who plans to be pregnant within one month after the trial(including male).
  • Patients who are opioid abuse.
  • Patients who are alcohol abuse.
  • Patients who are cognitive dysfunction.
  • Patients having a severe psychotic depression.
  • Patients with any other medical condition or reason, in that investigator's opinion, makes the patient unable to participate in a clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

Hydromorphone

Drug
  • For opioid-intolerant patients: continuous infusion of hydromorphone 0 mg per hour, and a demand dose of 0.5 mg with a lockout interval of 15 minutes.
  • For opioid-tolerant patients: basal rate 0 mg per hour, and a demand dose of 10% of the hydromorphone dose equivalent to the total opioid taken in the previous 24 hrs with a lockout interval of 15 minutes.

PCA pump

Device
  • For opioid-intolerant patients: initial dose 0.5 mg intravenous hydromorphone.
  • For opioid-tolerant patients: intravenous hydromorphone with a initial dose equivalent to 10%(5-15%) of the total opioid taken in the previous 24 hrs.

Primary outcomes

  1. The time of successful titration in 24 hours

    Time frame: In 24 hours

    The satisfied pain control was defined NRS pain score ≤ 3 at rest in at least 2 consecutive assessment (15 minutes interval). The time needed to successful titration was extended to achieve satisfied pain control again if NRS pain score ≥ 7 after satisfied pain control within 24 hours. The failure of successful titration was defined that satisfied pain control does not achieve within 24 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 60 minutes

    Time frame: Up to 60 minutes

    The percentage of patients who titrated successfully within 60 minutes

  2. The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 24 hours

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

    The percentage of patients who titrated successfully within 24 hours

  3. The mean NRS pain score of 24 hours

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

    The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is used to assess the severity of pain. The scale represents pain levels in 0-10 numbers, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the most severe pain. Ask the patient to choose the number that best represents his or her pain level, or ask the patient to ask: How severe is participant's pain? The health care provider selects the appropriate number based on the patient's description of the pain. 1-3 points indicate mild pain, 4-6 points indicate moderate pain, and 7-10 points indicate severe pain. "The mean NRS pain score of 24 hrs" is defined as the sum of the scores within 24 hours divided by the number of evaluations within 24 hours.

  4. The total dose of hydromorphone titrated from start of titration to TST

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

    The total dose of hydromorphone titrated from start of titration to TST

  5. The total dose of hydromorphone titrated within 24 hrs

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

    The total dose of hydromorphone titrated within 24 hrs

  6. Improvement of patient symptoms

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

    The change from baseline in questionnaire: Chinese version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

  7. Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 7 days

    treatment-related Adverse Events:

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fujian Cancer Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) vs Non-PCA Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration for Severe Cancer Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Dec 18, 2017
Registry last updated
Mar 8, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.