Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06441071

Patients' Positions on Analgesic Efficacy of ESPB

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if patients remaining different positions for 30min after receiving ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block influenced the postoperative analgesia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does patients maintain prone position or lateral position for 30 min after ESPB provided superior analgesic effect than in the supine position? Is ESPB not inferior to PVB considering postoperative opioid consumption ? Researchers will compare the opioid consumption 24h postoperatively among the patients remaining supine, lateral, prone position after ESPB and PVB to see if patients maintaining lateral or prone position provided excellent postoperative analgesia.

Participants will:

Maintaining supine lateral or prone position for 30 min following ESPB or receiving PVB.

Receiving postoperative NRS and QoR assessment

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

After signed the informed consent form, 200 patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into four groups: supine position group (group S, n = 50), prone position group (group P, n = 50), lateral position group (group L, n = 50) and paravertebral block group (group C, n = 50). After ESPB block, the corresponding position was maintained for 30 minutes.

Ultrasound-guided ESPB was performed 30min before general anesthesia. Ultrasound-guided ESPB methods: The ultrasonic high-frequency linear array probe (5-13 MHZ, Sonosite, USA) was placed parallel to the spine on the surface of the transverse process tip of the seventh thoracic vertebra. Under ultrasound, the transverse process and the surface of the erector spinae were clearly exposed. Then a long beved-plane needle was used, and the needle was inserted from the head side. 2ml of normal saline was injected using the water separation technique to confirm the position of the needle tip, and then 30ml 0.375% ropivacaine was injected.

After completion of the block, patients in group S were kept in the supine position for 30min, patients in group L were kept in the upper lateral position for 30min, and patients in group P were kept in the prone position for 30min. After 30 minutes of observation, an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the grouping used an ice cube to determine the extent of sensory block. General anesthesia was then performed.

General anesthesia was performed as follows: routine ECG monitoring was performed after the patient was admitted to the operating room, and invasive arterial blood pressure was monitored by radial artery puncture and catheterization. General anesthesia was induced with dexamethasone 10mg, midazolam 0.05mg.kg-1, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg.kg-1, sufentanil 0.2 ug.kg-1, cisatracurium 0.2 mg.kg-1, and then a double-luminal bronchial tube was inserted under a video laryngoscope and mechanically ventilated (tidal volume: 6-10ml.kg-1,PEEP: 3-5 cm H2O). Anesthesia was maintained with propofol (2-4 mg.kg-1.h-1), remifentanil (0.12-0.3 ug.kg-1.min-1) and Micuronium (0.6mg.kg-1.h-1). Intraoperative hemodynamics was maintained within 20% of baseline. Flurbiprofen axetil 50mg was given intravenously for analgesia and tropisetron 4mg was given to prevent nausea and vomiting when there were no contraindications during the operation. Oxycodone 3mg was administered intravenously 30min before the end of the procedure. At the end of the operation, the patient was transferred to PACU with an endotracheal tube. After neuromuscular blocking antagonism, the tracheal tube was extubated.

NRS was used to evaluate the pain scores at rest and during movement at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24h ,48h after operation by a nurse who was unaware of the grouping. Oxycodone 30mg diluted to 150ml was used for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after operation. The parameters of analgesia pump were set as background dose 0.5 ml.h-1, bolus 5ml, lockout time 8min. If NRS≥4 at rest after surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was performed by pressing the PCA pump. When NRS≥4 at rest was still ≥4 after two times of PCA, oxycodone 1mg was given once as rescue analgesia, and the patients were reevaluated until NRS≤3.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under elective general anaesthesia were selected, regardless of sex, age 18-80 years, BMI: 18-30 kg.m-2, ASA classification I-III.

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy to the study drug or allergy to local anaesthetics;
  • History of opioid abuse;
  • Previous nerve block puncture with puncture site infection;
  • Peripheral neuropathy;
  • Coagulation abnormalities, defined as prothrombin time or partial activation time prothrombin time exceeding standard values or international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 1.4, or platelet count ≤ 70 x 109 L-1.

Treatment and study plan

Position

Procedure

Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery were selected for the study, and nerve block was performed before surgery, followed by holding different positions for 30 min, after which the effect of the block was measured.

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Oxycodone dosage

    Time frame: 24 hour postoperatively

    Cumulative oxycodone dosage 24 hour postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Loss to cold sensation of skin

    Time frame: 30 minute after block

    The sensation to cold was assessed with ice. The area include the anterior chest wall (midclavicular line), lateral chest wall (posterior axillary line), and posterior chest wall (paraspinal zone) by a researcher who was blinded to group allocation.

  2. NRS(Numeric Rating Scales) score

    Time frame: Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour

    Postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour NRS (Numeric Rating Scales) score. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): This scale is composed of 11 numbers from 0 to 10, with higher numbers increasing the severity of pain.

  3. Adverse reaction

    Time frame: 24, 48 hour postoperatively

    This includes dizziness, nausea, vomiting, etc.

  4. QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR)

    Time frame: Day 1 and 2 postoperatively

    Postoperative QoR-15(Quality of Recovery) score was used to evaluate the quality of early postoperative recovery on postoperative day 1 and 2. . The QoR-15 score(Quality of Recovery,QoR) included 5 dimensions including emotional state, physical comfort, psychological support, physical independence and pain, with a total of 15 items. Each item scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores being better.

  5. Opioid dosage

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour postoperatively

    Postoperative opioid consumption dosage.

  6. Patient Comfort Scale score

    Time frame: 30 minute after block

    used to assess the comfort level of the patient according to the position during the procedure (grade 0=help, 2=uncomfortable, 4=mild discomfort, 6=feeling OK, 8=pretty comfortable, and 10=feeling great)

  7. Hemodynamic profile

    Time frame: Heart rate changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade

    Hemodynamic changes(Heart rate ) during blockade procedure

  8. Hemodynamic profile

    Time frame: Mean arterial pressure changes before blockade, 5minute after blockade, 10 minute after blockade, 20minute after blockade, 30minute after blockade

    Hemodynamic changes(Mean arterial pressure ) during blockade procedure

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Xinyi Bu, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 18360868010

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Different Patient's Positions on Postoperative Analgesia of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 4, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.