University of North Carolina Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery at REX
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
NCT Number: NCT06736808
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn if participants are better able to understand medical handouts written at below a sixth grade reading level compared to those written at above a sixth grade reading level. The main question it aims to answer is:
• Do participants score higher on a knowledge test after reading a handout written at below a sixth grade reading level compared to after reading a handout written at above a sixth grade reading level?
Researchers will compare knowledge scores on pelvic organ prolapse after participants read a handout written at an eight grade reading level compared to the same handout re-written to be at a fifth grade reading level.
Participants will:
* Read a one page handout (written at either above or below a sixth grade reading level) on pelvic organ prolapse * Complete a one page multiple-choice test on pelvic organ prolapse
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
The secondary objective is to determine characteristics of patients whose knowledge levels are higher after reading educational material written below a sixth grade reading level compared to material written above a sixth grade reading level.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants randomized to this experimental arm will read a simplified handout on pelvic organ prolapse written at below a sixth grade reading level.
Participants randomized to this control arm will read a standard handout on pelvic organ prolapse written at above a sixth grade reading level.
Time frame: Assessed during completion of a 5 minute survey after reading a one page informational handout for approximately 10 minutes
Mean number of correct answers from 0 to 12 on the validated Prolapse Knowledge Questionnaire where 0 indicates 0 correct answers (worst knowledge score) and 12 indicates all correct answers (best knowledge score).
Time frame: Assessed during completion of a 5 minute survey after reading a one page informational handout for approximately 10 minutes
Percentage of participants who respond "Yes" that reading the handout increased their understanding of pelvic organ prolapse on a Yes/No/Don't know scale.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
Assessment of Patient Understanding of Educational Material at Above and Below a Sixth Grade Reading Level
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07702591
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Burdur, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07566143
Adherence Interventions, Aging
Van, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07654478
Atrophy, Behavior
Taipei, Taipei City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07624695
Child Development, Health Literacy
Palermo, Italy
View Trial Details