Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04164004

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic

This is a randomized study evaluating the effect of routinely collecting a standardized questionnaire of heart failure health status during heart failure clinic visits. Participants will be randomized to early or delayed implementation of a validated health-related quality of life survey (the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire). Participants randomized to early implementation will be given this 12-question survey at each heart failure clinic visit at the beginning of the study; their heart failure clinician will have access to survey results but will continue to manage participants based on standard treatment practice. Patients randomized to delayed implementation will start receiving the survey at each clinic visit one year later. By comparing the health status and treatment rates between early and delayed implementation, this study will determine the impact of standardized health status assessment on patient outcomes and clinician decision-making.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Stanford Hospital & Clinics

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stanford Heart Failure clinic visit during enrollment period

Exclusion criteria

  • Seen in amyloid clinic

Treatment and study plan

Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12

Other

Health status assessment will be completed using the well-validated Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 prior to or at the time of heart failure clinic visits.

Other names: KCCQ-12

Primary outcomes

  1. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 Score

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    The first KCCQ-12 score collected one year after randomization will be compared between the KCCQ-12 and usual care arms. KCCQ-12 scores will be collected in the usual care arm starting one year after randomization. Scores will be adjusted for baseline KCCQ-12 in both arms. This will be the primary effectiveness outcome. KCCQ-12 has 4 domains (Physical Limitation Score, Symptom Frequency Score, Quality of Life Score, Social Limitation Score) and one Summary Score. Domain scores are scaled 0-100, and the overall score is the average of the domain scores. For the domain and overall scores, 0 denotes the lowest reportable health status and 100 the highest. Higher values represent a better outcome.

  2. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 Response Rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    Frequency of KCCQ-12 response at each clinic visit among patients in the KCCQ-12 arm. This will be the primary implementation outcome. The rate will be calculated as the number of responses divided by the total number of requests to complete the survey.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients on Beta-blocker Therapy Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Evaluated at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Beta-blocker therapy use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

  2. Median Dose of Beta-Blocker Therapy Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Evaluated at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among those patients on beta-blocker therapy, the specific medication and dose will be collected.

  3. Percentage of Patients on Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Use of any renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%. These include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors.

  4. Median Dose of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among those patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%, the specific medication and dose will be collected.

  5. Percentage of Patients on Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

  6. Median Dose of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% on Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist therapy, the specific medication and dose will be collected.

  7. Percentage of Patients on Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Among Patients With Preserved/Mid-Range Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%.

  8. Median Dose of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Among Patients With Preserved/Mid-Range Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction > 40% on Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist therapy, the specific medication and dose will be collected.

  9. Percentage of Patients on Hydralazine/Nitrate Therapy Among African-American Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Hydralazine/nitrate use among the subgroup of African-American patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

  10. Median Dose of Hydralazine/Nitrate Therapy Among African-American Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among the subgroup of African-American patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% on hydralazine/nitrate therapy, the specific dose will be collected

  11. Percentage of Patients on Sacubitril-Valsartan Therapy Among the Sub-group of Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Sacubitril-valsartan use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

  12. Median Dose of Sacubitril-Valsartan Therapy Among the Sub-group of Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% on sacubitril-valsartan, the specific dose will be collected.

  13. Percentage of Patients on Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Therapy Among the Sub-group of Patients With Preserved/Mid-range Ejection Fraction.

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%.

  14. Percentage of Patients on Sodium/Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Therapy Among the Sub-group of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction > 40%.

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%.

  15. Percentage of Patients on Ivabradine Therapy Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction With a Heart Rate Above 70 Beats Per Minute on Beta-Blocker Therapy

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Ivabradine use among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and a heart rate above 70 beats per minute in sinus rhythm.

  16. Median Dose of Ivabradine Therapy Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction With a Heart Rate Above 70 Beats Per Minute on Beta-Blocker Therapy

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization

    Among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and a heart rate above 70 beats per minute in sinus rhythm on ivabradine, the medication dose will be collected.

  17. Percentage of Patients With a Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Presence of an implantable cardiac defibrillator among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%.

  18. Percentage of Patients With a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Among Patients With Reduced Ejection

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Presence of cardiac resynchronization therapy among the sub-group of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% with electrocardiogram findings consistent with a left bundle branch block with QRS width >150ms.

  19. Percentage of Patients Given Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Among Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Referral to cardiac rehabilitation among the subgroup of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%.

  20. Number of Medication Adjustments Per Heart Failure Clinic Visit

    Time frame: Within one year post-randomization

    The number of medication adjustments made at each heart failure clinic visit. These will include dose changes, new medications, and discontinuation of prior medicines.

  21. Average Daily Loop Diuretic Dose

    Time frame: Each clinic visit over one year follow-up and first heart failure clinic visit at least one year after randomization

    The specific loop diuretic and dose will be collected. Diuretic doses will be converted into a standard total daily dose of loop diuretic.

  22. Count of Hospitalizations Per Patient

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Heart failure hospitalizations and non-heart failure hospitalizations in the Stanford healthcare system during the follow-up period.

  23. Count of Emergency Department Visits Per Patient

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Stanford emergency department visits during the follow-up period.

  24. Count of Heart Failure Clinic Visits Per Patient

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Stanford heart failure clinic visits during the followup period.

  25. Count of Telephone Encounters Per Patient

    Time frame: Evaluated through trial completion (first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview 15 months post-randomization)

    Stanford heart failure telephone encounters during the follow-up period.

  26. Percentage of Patients Who Undergo Formal Advanced Heart Failure Therapy Evaluation

    Time frame: Within one year post-randomization

    Formal work-up for heart transplant or LVAD (left ventricular assist device) eligibility

  27. Quality of Patient Clinic Experience

    Time frame: First clinic visit post-randomization within approximately 14 days

    The results from a 10-question survey with ordinal responses regarding patient experience in clinic to a sub-study of all participants enrolled after the first month.

  28. Correlation Between Clinician and Patient Perception of Health Status

    Time frame: First clinic visit post-randomization within approximately 14 days

    Patient and clinician perception of health status will be collected. Patient perception is collected via the KCCQ-12 while clinicians will be surveyed regarding health status. We will determine the correlation between patient and clinician perception using an ordinal scale. We will compare correlation across arms.

  29. Cardiovascular Diagnostic Test Frequency

    Time frame: Within one year post-randomization

    Number of diagnostic tests performed between randomization and one year post-randomization. Diagnostic tests include cardiovascular imaging (echocardiography, MRI, cardiac CT, nuclear scan), invasive testing (coronary angiography, right heart catheterization), or ambulatory rhythm monitoring.

  30. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 Score Among Patients With Heart Failure or Cardiomyopathy

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview/web questionnaire 15 months post-randomization

    The first KCCQ-12 score collected one year after randomization will be compared between the KCCQ-12 and usual care arms among patients with heart failure or cardiomyopathy The first KCCQ-12 score collected one year after randomization will be compared between the KCCQ-12 and usual care arms. KCCQ-12 scores will be collected in the usual care arm starting one year after randomization. Scores will be adjusted for baseline KCCQ-12 in both arms. This will be the primary effectiveness outcome. KCCQ-12 has 4 domains (Physical Limitation Score, Symptom Frequency Score, Quality of Life Score, Social Limitation Score) and one Summary Score. Scores are scaled 0-100, where 0 denotes the lowest reportable health status and 100 the highest.

  31. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 Score Among Patients With Sub-optimal Health Status at Baseline

    Time frame: Collected at the first heart failure clinic visit at least one year post-randomization or via telephone interview/web questionnaire 15 months post-randomization

    The first KCCQ-12 score collected one year after randomization will be compared between the KCCQ-12 and usual care arms among patients with baseline KCCQ <100 at baseline

  32. Number of Total Heart Failure Medication Adjustments

    Time frame: Number of medication adjustments from randomization to one year post randomization

    The total number of heart failure medication adjustments. Heart failure medications include beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, hydralazine/nitrate therapy, ivabradine, or loop diuretics.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stanford University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Heart Failure Clinic

Acronym: PRO-HF

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Nov 15, 2019
Registry last updated
Apr 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.