Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
NCT Number: NCT06832891
This study aims to evaluate whether patients have different preference patterns for empathetic communication through AI vs human-being when knowledge of authorship is known vs blinded.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Hypothesis:
Patients will express increased preference for human-generated empathetic communication vs AI-generated empathetic communication when they are made aware of authorship vs when blinded to it.
Aims, purpose, or objectives:
Evaluate if patients have different preference patterns for empathetic communication through AI vs human-being when knowledge of authorship is known vs blinded
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining a foothold in the healthcare industry. AI's role in healthcare can largely be divided into two sets of tasks: Those which involve direct interaction with patients and those which do not. Many tasks which do not directly interact with patients, such as monitoring and resupplying medications, delivering goods across a hospital, and analyzing practice trends and outcomes are highly likely to benefit from the efficiency, cost-savings, and consistency AI can provide. Tasks involving direct patient interaction are considerably more controversial. Understanding of how patients will respond to AI communication remains quite limited which is concerning considering the rapid expansion of AI into the healthcare space. A logical first step to investigate is to see if patients react to AI communication when they are blinded to it vs when authorship is known. This concept has previously been tested in other industries such as business and the law, but patient communication preference in healthcare has been little studied, especially in palliative care. It is the aim of this study to investigate this.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients complete survey
Time frame: Baseline
Assessed by a brief survey: patients will be show two brief empathetic statements related to their serious illness diagnosis (Cancer), one generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and one generated by a human physician in palliative care who were both given the same writing instructions and generated their responses independently. Half of the surveys will label which statement is generated by human or AI unblinded group) and the other half will be blinded to statement authorship. Preference will be compared between the blinded and unblinded groups.
Mayo Clinic
Other
A Survey of Patient Preferences on Empathetic Communication in Outpatient Palliative Care
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05150769
Behavior, Health Behavior
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05970471
Behavior, Breast Diseases
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04831788
Behavior, Health Behavior
Novi Sad, Vojvodina, Serbia
View Trial DetailsNCT04933578
Behavior, Behavior, Child
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details