UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Amy Rose, RN
CONTACT
Danielle L Bednarz, RN
CONTACT
Diwakar J Davar, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07223424
The study will evaluate patient and Health Care Professional- reported preference for Subcutaneous (SC) compared with IV nivolumab administration or similarly for SC compared with IV pembrolizumab.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Amy Rose, RN
CONTACT
Danielle L Bednarz, RN
CONTACT
Diwakar J Davar, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The development of SC nivolumab and SC pembrolizumab was intended to provide patients, physicians and health care systems compelling advantages to reduce the burden associated with ICI administration. However, despite the results of CheckMate 76K, Hillman Cancer Center utilization of SC nivolumab is poor. This study aims to formally assess, from the patients' perspective, whether SC administration of ICI agents is preferable to IV administration. Key secondary objectives include physician experience with SC vs. IV administration, cancer-related efficacy endpoints, and safety. Patients who are pending initiation of nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab-based chemotherapy or targeted therapy combinations (Cohort A-1) will be enrolled. However, patients who are already receiving nivolumab or other ICI but are willing to be switched to nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab-based combinations may be eligible to enroll in a separate cohort (Cohort B-1). US FDA has accepted a Biologics License Application from Merck for SC pembrolizumab for an FDA action date of 9/23/2025. Should SC pembrolizumab achieve FDA approval, we will aim to open 2 separate cohorts to evaluate patient preference for SC vs. IV pembrolizumab.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
o Patients should either be ICI-naïve (Cohorts A-1, A-2) or be currently receiving adjuvant or front-line PD-(L)1 based therapy singly or in combination with FDA-approved agents (TKIs or chemotherapy) (Cohorts B-1, B-2).
Exclusion criteria
IV nivolumab (480mg Q4W), SC nivolumab (1200mg Q4W)
Other names: OPDIVO®
IV pembrolizumab (400mg Q6W) or SC pembrolizumab (790mg Q6W)
Other names: Keytruda®
Time frame: Up to 48 months
The proportion of patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors who prefer SC to IV nivolumab.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
The proportion of patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors who prefer SC to IV pembrolizumab.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Patient assessed satisfaction with SC vs. IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) using Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (using TASQ-IV) in patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors pending initiation of nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) monotherapy or nivolumab- (or pembrolizumab-) based combinations.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Patient assessed satisfaction with SC vs. IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) using Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (using TASQ-SC) in patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors pending initiation of nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) monotherapy or nivolumab- (or pembrolizumab-) based combinations.
Time frame: Screening Phase - Up to 28 days after signed consent
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument. The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores (all items) range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 3
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument (30 items). The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 6
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument (30 items). The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 48 nmonths
Changes in patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument. The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Screening Phase - Up to 28 days after signed consent
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 3
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 6
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Change in patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Physician-defined time to next therapy (TTNT) is defined as the period from the start of the treatment to the start of the next line of treatment.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that result in a dose hold or delay in patients treated with either SC or IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) guidelines v5
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Amy Rose, RN
CONTACT
Danielle L Bednarz, RN
CONTACT
Diwakar Davar
Other
Patient Preference for Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Immune Therapy (PSI-Immune)
Acronym: PSI-Immune
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05858736
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06047379
Adenocarcinoma, Astrocytoma
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03652077
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03190174
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial Details