Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807, United States
NCT Number: NCT01226043
Primary Objective:
To assess patient preference for Lantus SoloSTAR pen versus Lantus vial and syringe at the end of Crossover Phase (Week 4) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
Secondary Objectives:
To compare Lantus SoloSTAR pen versus Lantus vial and syringe with regard to the following parameters:
Randomization/Crossover phase:
* Healthcare professional's (HCP) recommendation for Lantus SoloSTAR pen versus Lantus vial and syringe
Re-randomization phase:
* Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) from week 4 to week 10 * Percentage of patients achieving FPG<110 mg/dL at week 10 * Change in Lantus dose injected per day (U) from week 4 to week 10
Observational phase:
* Percentage of patients achieving glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) goal (<7%) at week 40 * Time to first observation of HbA1c<7% during the observational phase * Percentage of patients who discontinue Investigational Product (IP) during the observational phase due to dissatisfaction with their current device
All phases:
* Percentage of patients who discontinue IP during each phase of the study * Safety assessment such as occurrence of hypoglycemic events (HE) and adverse events (AE)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807, United States
This study consisted of a 1 week Screening Phase, a 4-week Randomization/Crossover Phase, a 6-week Re-randomization Phase, followed by a 30 week Observational Phase.
The total duration of study participation was up to 41 weeks with a total treatment duration of up to 40 weeks of Lantus exposure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with any combination of 2 or 3 oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) at a stable dose for the preceding 3 months, including but not limited to:
And for whom the Investigator/treating physician had decided that basal insulin was appropriate.
Patients who had signed an Informed Consent Form and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization Form
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Lantus
Time frame: At week 4 (end of crossover phase)
The patient preference was assessed in terms of the difference in scores obtained from the overall preference question 14d "Overall, what is your level of preference for each of the insulin delivery systems?"
5 points scale: from 1=Not preferred to 5= Always preferred
Time frame: At week 4 (end of crossover phase)
The patient preference composite score was the sum of the scores of the 3 following individual preference questions from the Patient preference Questionnaire:
Each individual question scored from 1 to 5. The lowest score 1 indicated 'Not Preferred' and the highest score 5 indicated 'Always Preferred'. Therefore the total range of the composite score was 3 to 15.
Time frame: At week 4 (end of crossover phase)
The overall recommendation score was obtained from the question 20d of the Healthcare Professional Questionnaire: "Overall, how strongly would you recommend each of the insulin delivery systems for your patients?"
5 points scale: from 1= Not Recommended to 5= Recommended
Time frame: From week 4 (baseline for re-randomization phase) to week 10 (end of re-randomization phase)
Time frame: At week 10 (end of re-randomization phase)
Time frame: From week 4 (baseline for re-randomization phase) to week 10 (end of re-randomization phase)
Time frame: measured at week 40 or at study discontinuation
Percentage of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% at Week 40 (end of the observational phase)
Time frame: From week 10 to week 40 (observational phase)
Time frame: From baseline to week 4 (crossover phase)
Time frame: From week 4 to week 10 (re-randomization phase)
Time frame: From week 10 to week 40 (observational phase)
Time frame: each study phase (crossover, re-randomization, observational) up to 40 weeks
The hypoglycemic event was to be recorded on the electronic case report form hypoglycemia page and had to fit in one of the following categories: Mild-to-moderate hypoglycemia (36 mg/dL ≤ Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) <70mg/dL), Severe hypoglycemia (assistance of another person is required, and either a recorded SMBG <36 mg/dL, or treatment with oral carbohydrates, intravenous glucose or glucagon with prompt response) or Hypoglycemia symptoms with or without SMBG values with a documented SMBG >70 mg/dL, or no recorded SMBG value. Only hypoglycemia events associated with coma, loss of consciousness or seizure were considered serious adverse event (SAEs).
Sanofi
Industry
An Open Label Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Patient Preference for and Evaluate Clinical Benefit of Insulin Glargine (Lantus®) SoloSTAR® Pen Versus Conventional Vial/Syringe Method of Insulin Glargine (Lantus®) Injection Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym: Pen Preference
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details