Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02849509

Patient Convenience Study- NIS RELATE

The aim of this non-interventional study is to describe patient's perception of anticoagulant treatment when using Pradaxa® to prevent stroke and systemic embolism while suffering from atrial fibrillation (according to its approved indication in the approved dosages of 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) in comparison to standard care using Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Cohort A:

  • A. Written informed consent prior to participation
  • A. Female and male patients >= 18 years of age with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
  • A. At least 3 months of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment.
  • A. Patients switched to Pradaxa® according Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion.

OR

Cohort B:

  • B. Written informed consent prior to participation.
  • B. Female and male patients >= 18 years of age newly diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no previous treatment for stroke prevention (no use of any oral anticoagulant (OAC) within one year prior to enrolment).
  • B. Stroke prevention treatment initiated with Pradaxa® or VKA according to Summary of Product Characteristics and physician's discretion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to the use of Pradaxa® or VKA as described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
  • Patients receiving Pradaxa® or VKA for any other condition than stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
  • Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device.
  • Current participation in an European registry on the use of oral anticoagulation in AF.

Treatment and study plan

Pradaxa (dabigatran)

Drug

Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate)110mg or 150mg

Vitamin K antagonist

Drug

Vitamin K antagonist or Pradaxa

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire, Part 2 (PACT-Q2) Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Second Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

    Mean Perception of Anticoagulant treatment Questionnaire, part 2 (PACT-Q2) scores, for patients in cohort A, at second assessment compared to baseline assessment. The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease & treatment (2 items), & anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). In this outcome the mean convenience & satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at second assessment (Visit 2) were compared with baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience & for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together & rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed & rescaled on 0-100 scale to determine satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable.

    PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from analysis.

  2. Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Baseline Assessment

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and last assessment Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to baseline assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3) were compared with the baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable.

    PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.

  3. Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Second Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups

    Time frame: Second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at second assessment compared between treatment groups. Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome.

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the second assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement.

    PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.

  4. Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort B, at Last Assessment Compared Between Treatment Groups

    Time frame: Last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at last assessment compared between treatment groups.

    Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome.

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the last assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement.

  5. Patient Characterization at Baseline - Categorical Parameters

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    Categorical parameters of the patient characteristics at baseline included age, gender, Stroke- and/or bleeding related risk factors in medical history (MH), co-morbidities (CoMo), concomitant therapies (CM) and dosing of Pradaxa® (DoP).

  6. Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Duration of Previous VKA Treatment for Cohort A

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    Duration of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment (Cohort A)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Characteristics at Baseline - CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category.

    CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

  2. Patient Characteristics at Baseline - HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol.

    HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

  3. Patient Characteristics at Baseline - Creatinine Clearance

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    Creatinine clearance at baseline is a measure of the patient's kidney function and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.

  4. Mean PACT-Q2 Scores, for Patients in Cohort A, at Last Assessment Compared to Second Assessment

    Time frame: Second assessment - Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA) and last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)

    Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to second assessment.

    The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items).

    The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3)were compared with the second assessment (Visit 2). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score.

  5. Description of Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire, Part 1 (PACT-Q1) Items at Baseline for Cohort B

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)

    For Cohort B, scores of PACT-Q1 at baseline were summarised descriptively.

    The PACT-Q1 is composed of a single dimension (7 items) covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment and is to be administered before treatment initiation.

    The PACT-Q1 scores ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/Completely/ Very much).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Non-interventional Study Describing Patients' Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment and Treatment Convenience When Treated With Pradaxa or Vitamin K Antagonist for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation.

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jul 29, 2016
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.