Pradaxa (dabigatran)
DrugPradaxa (dabigatran etexilate)110mg or 150mg
NCT Number: NCT02849509
The aim of this non-interventional study is to describe patient's perception of anticoagulant treatment when using Pradaxa® to prevent stroke and systemic embolism while suffering from atrial fibrillation (according to its approved indication in the approved dosages of 110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) in comparison to standard care using Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Harapan Kita National Cardiovascular Center, Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Cohort A:
OR
Cohort B:
Exclusion criteria
Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate)110mg or 150mg
Vitamin K antagonist or Pradaxa
Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)
Mean Perception of Anticoagulant treatment Questionnaire, part 2 (PACT-Q2) scores, for patients in cohort A, at second assessment compared to baseline assessment. The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease & treatment (2 items), & anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items). In this outcome the mean convenience & satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at second assessment (Visit 2) were compared with baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience & for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together & rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed & rescaled on 0-100 scale to determine satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable.
PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from analysis.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Baseline) and last assessment Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to baseline assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3) were compared with the baseline assessment (Visit 1). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score. High scores are more favorable.
PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.
Time frame: Second assessment Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at second assessment compared between treatment groups. Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome.
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the second assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement.
PACT-Q2 which were completed more than 1 day after discontinuation of treatment or using incorrect procedure were excluded from the analysis.
Time frame: Last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort B, at last assessment compared between treatment groups.
Convenience dimension score and satisfaction dimension score of PACT-Q2 both range from 0 to 100 with high scores indicate better outcome.
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in Cohort B, were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients at the last assessment. The mean convenience and satisfaction scores of PACT-Q2 were compared between matched Pradaxa® and VKA patients. Pradaxa® and VKA patients were matched based on propensity scores using a variable ratio, parallel, balanced 2:1, nearest neighbour matching algorithm with a caliper width of 0.05 and without replacement.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
Categorical parameters of the patient characteristics at baseline included age, gender, Stroke- and/or bleeding related risk factors in medical history (MH), co-morbidities (CoMo), concomitant therapies (CM) and dosing of Pradaxa® (DoP).
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
Duration of continuous VKA treatment for stroke prevention prior to baseline assessment (Cohort A)
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category.
CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly (>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol.
HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
Creatinine clearance at baseline is a measure of the patient's kidney function and is one of the baseline patient characteristics.
Time frame: Second assessment - Visit 2 (7-124 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA) and last assessment - Visit 3 (125-365 days after initiation on Pradaxa or VKA)
Mean PACT-Q2 scores, for patients in cohort A, at last assessment compared to second assessment.
The PACT-Q2 is composed of 3 dimensions covering: convenience (11 items), burden of disease and treatment (2 items), and anticoagulant treatment satisfaction (7 items).
The mean convenience and satisfaction dimension scores of PACT-Q2 at the last assessment (Visit 3)were compared with the second assessment (Visit 2). Within the PACT-Q2, items for convenience and for burden of disease and treatment were reversed (reversed score = 6 - item score), added together and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to obtain the convenience dimension score. Items for anticoagulant treatment satisfaction were summed and rescaled on a 0-100 scale to determine the satisfaction score.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit1)
For Cohort B, scores of PACT-Q1 at baseline were summarised descriptively.
The PACT-Q1 is composed of a single dimension (7 items) covering the expectations of patients regarding their anticoagulant treatment and is to be administered before treatment initiation.
The PACT-Q1 scores ranged from 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely/Completely/ Very much).
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Non-interventional Study Describing Patients' Perception on Anticoagulant Treatment and Treatment Convenience When Treated With Pradaxa or Vitamin K Antagonist for Stroke Prophylaxis in Atrial Fibrillation.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details