Länssjukhuset Ryhov
Jönköping, 55185, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT04631393
The purpose of this prospective, observational study is to assess the feasibility of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) for implantation of subcutaneous venous ports (SVP).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–105 year
All sexes
Observational
Jönköping, 55185, Sweden
The main objective of this trial is to study the feasibility of (PCS) with propofol and alfentanil during SVP implantation.
Participants included in the study are able to administer a combination of propofol and alfentanil using a patient-controlled sedation pump. This allows the patient to self-control their sedation/analgesia during SVP implantation. The pump enables the patient via a hand-held button to trigger the release of a single bolus. A bolus of 0.5ml programmed into the pump contains a combination of 4.5mg propofol and 25µg alfentanil and is administered under a 7 second period resulting in a maximal amount of 8 bolus doses per minute.
Each SVP implantation procedure is separated into four time points at which sedation scores are recorded. Patients are monitored by anaesthesia staff and SVP implantation is performed by an anaesthesiologist according to hospital protocol.
Participants are asked to fill in a written questionnaire to indicate pain score and satisfaction with the procedure when ready for discharge.
Adverse events, time consumption and operators satisfaction with implantation conditions are recorded periprocedural.
The result of this trial will provide guidance for a larger randomized trial (PACSPI-2) comparing several clinically relevant aspects of the use of PCS and local anesthesia (LA) versus LA alone during SVP implantation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Propofol and Alfentanil are self-administered by the participant.
Other names: Propofol/Alfentanil self-administration
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of maximal pain level experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain I know) on patient questionnaire.
Time frame: after completion of procedure
From procedure start (local anesthesia injection) until end of procedure (last suture).
Time frame: after completion of procedure
The total dose of given sedation and analgesia.
Time frame: after completion of procedure
The port-implanting physicians assessment of implantation conditions during the procedure on a numeric rating scale (0=worst possible, 10= best possible)
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of overall satisfaction experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of satisfaction with the staff using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of pain from arm with the infusion using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain I know) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of satisfaction with pain treatment on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of the importance of receiving sedatives on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not important, 10=very important) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area
Participants assessment of the importance of being in control of sedation administration on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not important, 10=very important) on patient questionnaire
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Physicians assessment after completion of procedure.
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Physicians assessment after completion of procedure.
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Defined as heart < 40/minutes during the procedure
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Defined as Oxygen saturation <90% or significant drop from baseline (>5% SaO2 drop) during the procedure
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Defined as intervention by staff with chin lift during the procedure
Time frame: after completion of procedure
Defined as respiratory rate <8/minute during the procedure
Time frame: during procedure at time point T1: sterile skin prepping; T2: local anaesthetic injection; T3: tunneling procedure; T4: draping removal
Depth of sedation measured by Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale OAAS
Stefanie Seifert
Other Gov
Patient-controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-1)-a Feasibility Trial
Acronym: PACSPI-1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05468398
Behavior, Health Behavior
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07241988
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
İzmir, Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07145203
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Nablus, West Bank, Palestinian Territories
View Trial DetailsNCT04969900
Anesthesia, Behavior
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details