Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04631393

Patient-controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-1)

The purpose of this prospective, observational study is to assess the feasibility of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) for implantation of subcutaneous venous ports (SVP).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–105 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Länssjukhuset Ryhov

Jönköping, 55185, Sweden

About this study

The main objective of this trial is to study the feasibility of (PCS) with propofol and alfentanil during SVP implantation.

Participants included in the study are able to administer a combination of propofol and alfentanil using a patient-controlled sedation pump. This allows the patient to self-control their sedation/analgesia during SVP implantation. The pump enables the patient via a hand-held button to trigger the release of a single bolus. A bolus of 0.5ml programmed into the pump contains a combination of 4.5mg propofol and 25µg alfentanil and is administered under a 7 second period resulting in a maximal amount of 8 bolus doses per minute.

Each SVP implantation procedure is separated into four time points at which sedation scores are recorded. Patients are monitored by anaesthesia staff and SVP implantation is performed by an anaesthesiologist according to hospital protocol.

Participants are asked to fill in a written questionnaire to indicate pain score and satisfaction with the procedure when ready for discharge.

Adverse events, time consumption and operators satisfaction with implantation conditions are recorded periprocedural.

The result of this trial will provide guidance for a larger randomized trial (PACSPI-2) comparing several clinically relevant aspects of the use of PCS and local anesthesia (LA) versus LA alone during SVP implantation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for SVP implantation at Ryhov County Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to operate the PCS apparatus,
  • Inability to communicate in Scandinavian languages.
  • Patients who require general anaesthesia or patients eligible for local anaesthesia only (i.e. severe sleep apnea).
  • Propofol or alfentanil allergy.
  • Intake of food (or clear fluids) within six (or two) hours prior to the procedure.
  • Failure to achieve peripheral vascular access.
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Propofol Alfentanil

Drug

Propofol and Alfentanil are self-administered by the participant.

Other names: Propofol/Alfentanil self-administration

Primary outcomes

  1. Participants maximal pain level

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of maximal pain level experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain I know) on patient questionnaire.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural time consumption

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    From procedure start (local anesthesia injection) until end of procedure (last suture).

  2. Delivered doses of propofol and alfentanil

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    The total dose of given sedation and analgesia.

  3. Grading of implantation conditions by the implanting physician

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    The port-implanting physicians assessment of implantation conditions during the procedure on a numeric rating scale (0=worst possible, 10= best possible)

  4. Participants overall satisfaction

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of overall satisfaction experienced during the procedure using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire

  5. Participants satisfaction with staff

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of satisfaction with the staff using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire

  6. Participants maximal pain from arm where infusion is

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of pain from arm with the infusion using a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain I know) on patient questionnaire

  7. Participants satisfaction with pain treatment during implantation

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of satisfaction with pain treatment on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not satisfied at all, 10=very satisfied) on patient questionnaire

  8. Participants evaluation of the importance of receiving sedatives during the procedure

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of the importance of receiving sedatives on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not important, 10=very important) on patient questionnaire

  9. Participants evaluation of the importance of being in control of sedation administration

    Time frame: 10 minutes before discharge from recovery area

    Participants assessment of the importance of being in control of sedation administration on a numeric rating scale from 0-10 (0=not important, 10=very important) on patient questionnaire

Other outcomes

  1. Arterial puncture

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Physicians assessment after completion of procedure.

  2. Pneumothorax

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Physicians assessment after completion of procedure.

  3. Bradycardia

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Defined as heart < 40/minutes during the procedure

  4. Hypoxia

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Defined as Oxygen saturation <90% or significant drop from baseline (>5% SaO2 drop) during the procedure

  5. Airway intervention (Chin lift)

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Defined as intervention by staff with chin lift during the procedure

  6. Respiratory rate

    Time frame: after completion of procedure

    Defined as respiratory rate <8/minute during the procedure

  7. Sedation score at time points T1-T4

    Time frame: during procedure at time point T1: sterile skin prepping; T2: local anaesthetic injection; T3: tunneling procedure; T4: draping removal

    Depth of sedation measured by Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale OAAS

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Stefanie Seifert

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Patient-controlled Sedation in Port Implantation (PACSPI-1)-a Feasibility Trial

Acronym: PACSPI-1

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Nov 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.