Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT06721000

Patient Control Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural.

As one of the complications of THR is post operative pain, which usually requires epidural catheter insertion.

We are comparing the effect of patient control epidural versus conventional epidural for patient's satisfaction.

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Liaquat national hospital and medical college

Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan

About this study

More than 20 years of successful usage of epidural analgesia for post operative pain treatment include intermittent provider-administer bolus, patient control analgesia and continuous epidural infusion with or without patient control epidural analgesia. The main drawback of conventional epidural infusion is that it does not allow for individual variation in management of pain. As a result, patient control epidural analgesia has replaced it in recent years.3. It has been demonstrated that continuous epidural infusion with patient control epidural analgesia is highly effective at providing consistent analgesia, improving patient satisfaction, and reducing the workload of anesthesia provider but it is linked to higher local anesthetic consumption4 In patient undergoing THR, patient control epidural analgesia may be considered as an appropriate alternative for managing post operative pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Age >18 years. ASA 1-2 on pre anesthesia evaluation. Spontaneous breathing. Spo2 >95% Informed consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

A history of long-term opioid therapy (use of opioid analgesic at doses higher than codeine 120mg/day, hydrocodone 40mg/day, tramadol 200mg/day or oxycodone 40mg/day 0-4 days before surgery).

Indication of revision surgery during immediate post operative care. Acute skin disease. Patients' refusal. ASA 3 and 4. Hypersensitivity to study drugs.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual analogue score

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed after 2hours, 12hours and 24hours after surgery according to patient's pain intensity.

    Score will be from 1-10, 10 means maximum satisfaction and 1 means minimal satisfaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Patient Control Epidural Versus Conventional Epidural After Total Hip Replacement

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 6, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 30, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.