University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
NCT Number: NCT00998023
The purpose of this research study is to collect information on the amount of discomfort patients experience with one of two different vascular blood vessel closure devices, the MynxM5 Vascular Closure Device and the Angio-Seal Evolution Vascular Closure Device.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Gainesville, Florida, 32610, United States
The traditional, standard technique of achieving femoral artery hemostasis following diagnostic and interventional catheterization procedures requires compression methods such as manual pressure or clamps held at the puncture site for 10 to 30 minutes, or even longer depending on sheath size and anticoagulation status. This traditional method can be associated with patient discomfort as well as prolonged bed rest, ambulation and hospital discharge.
Over the past decade, Vascular Closure Devices (VCDs), which include collagen hemostasis devices, percutaneous suture-mediated closure devices and metallic clips, have emerged as a novel means for reducing time to hemostasis and ambulation following catheterization procedures performed utilizing femoral arterial access. Previous studies with commercially available VCDs have shown that the reduction in time to hemostasis and time to ambulation and discharge have also led to increased patient satisfaction over manual compression.
The MynxM5 Vascular Closure Device received FDA approval on April 8, 2009. Like the Mynx 6/7F Vascular Closure Device, which received FDA approval on May 16, 2007, both are designed to achieve femoral artery hemostasis via delivery of an extravascular, water-soluble synthetic sealant which expands upon contact with subcutaneous fluids to seal the arteriotomy. In theory, the lack of pressure needed to clamp, suture, clip or cinch, which is required with intravascular closure devices, may provide an advantage in regards to increased patient comfort during closure device deployment when using the Mynx.
Although VCDs have demonstrated an increase in patient comfort and satisfaction over manual compression, little data exists regarding patient comfort when comparing different closure devices. This study is designed to evaluate patient comfort between the MynxM5 and Angio-Seal Evolution Vascular Closure Devices.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of two different vascular closure devices.
Other names: Mynx
Comparison of two different vascular closure devices.
Other names: AngioSeal
Time frame: Immediately before vascular closure and immediately after vascular closure.
The Visual Analogue Scale measures the severity of pain on a continuous scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Time frame: 1 Day
Number of participants with permanent access site-related nerve injury, access-site related surgical/vascular repair, amputation related to access closure complication, access site-related bleeding/hematoma requiring transfusion, any new ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia requiring non-surgical intervention, local access site-related or generalized infection requiring prolonged hospitalization or re-hospitalization and treatment with IV antibiotics or inflammatory reaction that may include local signs and drainage, treated with re-hospitalization, IV antibiotics and/or surgical intervention
University of Florida
Other
Patient Comfort Study With Vascular Closure: Mynx vs. Angio-Seal Evolution
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06851481
Femoral Arteriotomy Closure, Vascular Closure
Clayton, Clayton VIC, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT03756558
Vascular Closure
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05822804
Endovascular Procedure, Femoral Artery
Wuhu, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05027698
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endovascular Procedure
Dendermonde, Belgium
View Trial Details