Patient Centered-Rehabilitation ver111090.1

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is an ecologically relevant measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a black screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Total Score is the sum of error for all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is a measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a blank screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Score is the average error across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) is a measure of object location association memory. The OLTT requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Free Recall, participants are given a blank screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Total Score is the sum of error for all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Score is the average error across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent better performance.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Cued Recall, participants are shown the "room" or environment on the screen and asked to touch the area of the screen an object was located. Average Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Recognition, participants are asked to select the correct location of an object from three options on the screen. Recognition total is the number of correct selections on all 15 trials. Higher scores represent better performance.

The Object Location Touchscreen Task (OLTT) requires participants to learn and recall the location of 15 object-location associations. Memory is evaluated using a touchscreen monitor, which allows for the continuous measurement of memory accuracy (i.e., distance from targeted location). During the Recognition, participants are asked to select the correct location of an object from three options on the screen. Recognition Average Response Time is the average latency to respond across all 15 trials. Lower scores represent faster responses.

The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.

The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is the exact same as two items ago. Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.

The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During Semantic-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is in the same semantic category as the picture two items ago (e.g., both fruits). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. Higher scores represent better discriminability.

The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). During 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is the exact same as two items ago. Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. By subtracting the 0-back d', the calculated score represents a more pure working memory measure. Scores closer to zero or positive represent better working memory performance.

The n-back is a well validated measure of working memory. During 0-back, participants are asked to respond by pressing a key when the picture on the screen is the same as the given target (e.g., a cow). During Semantic 2-back, participants are asked to respond when a picture shown is in the same semantic category as the picture two items ago (e.g., both fruits). Discriminability (d') is a measure of signal detection that accounts for signal to noise ratio. By subtracting the 0-back d', the calculated score represents a more pure working memory measure. Scores closer to zero or positive represent better working memory performance.

Participants were asked to estimate which group they were in (i.e., active or sham).

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".

The side effects were assessed using a modified version of Brunoni et al. (2011) questionnaire. Participants rated common sensory experiences on a scale of "None, Mild, Moderate, or Severe".