Faculty of Dentistry
Cairo, 1234, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05622448
To compare PEEK to metallic partial denture frameworks in restoring mandibular Kennedy class I regarding patient satisfaction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 1234, Egypt
The traditional RPDs with cobalt chromium frameworks and clasps have been proven to be inexpensive, accurate, durable and resistant to distortion .2 On the other hand, they have; unesthetic display of metallic clasps, increased weight, and may provoke an allergic reaction. Because of those drawbacks new metal-free materials have been reported as a replacement of metal alloys in manufacturing RPDs, including; high performance polymers such as polyethylene glycol, polyetherketonketon (PEKK), polyaryletherketone (PAEK) and Polyetheretherketon (PEEK).
Using PEEK and modified PEEK (BioHPP) frameworks were claimed to reduce the distal torqueing and stresses on the abutments in kennedy class I PPDs which is thought to be beneficial for periodontal health of the abutments.10 One of the factors for the dissatisfaction related to the dentures may be attributed to the level of oral perception of each patient. The satisfaction level of the patient is influenced by several factors, including the dentures quality and the plated area, the quality of interaction in the patient-dentist relationship, past experiences with full dentures, and the psychological personality6. In harmony, such factors may promote the improvement of the mastication, the speech, and the aesthetics of the teeth, besides producing less discomfort and pain sensitivity, favoring the comminution of harder food7. However, there are no clinical trials evaluating the effect of PEEK on patient satisfaction and the marginal bone loss around the abutments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
removable partial denture with CAD designed PEEK framework
removable partial denture with cobalt chromium framework
Time frame: From enrollment to the last follow up
Patient satisfaction will be measured using a valid and reliable questionnaire which is Patient satisfaction with lower removable denture questionnaire SLRD-Q.
likert scale ranges from very good (1) to good (2), neither good nor bad (3), bad (4), and extremely bad (5)
Time frame: From enrollment to the last follow up
Time frame: 2 years
Radiographic follow up will be performed for marginal bone changes.
Cairo University
Other
Patient Centered Outcomes and Marginal Bone Changes in CAD/CAM Metallic and Poly Ether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Partial Denture Frameworks
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05613439
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Behavior
Copenhagen, Capital Region, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06506669
Anesthesia, Behavior
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01052415
Behavior, HIV-related Stigma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06458647
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Talas, Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details