Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04370444

Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and effectiveness of two tools that may help address the management of deep dyspareunia: 1) A phallus length reducer (PLR, brand name: Ohnut), consisting of 4 interconnected silicone rings worn externally over the penetrating object to reduce pain with deep penetration by allowing adjustable limitation of penetration depth, and 2) A vaginal insert for at home self-assessment of the extent and severity of deep dyspareunia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Background: Endometriosis is a gynecological condition characterized by the abnormal growth of endometrial like tissue outside of the uterus. The condition affects approximately 10% of reproductive-age females and can cause various types of pain, including chronic pelvic pain and deep dyspareunia (pelvic pain with deep sexual intercourse). Research has shown that individuals with endometriosis and dyspareunia have significantly reduced sexual quality of life, lower self-esteem, and impaired sexual function. Qualitative research has also demonstrated that many individuals with dyspareunia feel guilty about their pain, and often continue to engage in intercourse even when the pain is severe.

Aims and Hypotheses:

  • To measure the reduction in deep dyspareunia observed among people using the PLR with their partner. The investigators hypothesize that the PLR will be associated with a reduction in self-reported deep dyspareunia scores among participants randomized to the PLR intervention, compared to participants randomized to the waitlist control group. The measured reduction in deep dyspareunia will be used to power a future definitive trial.
  • To assess the acceptability of the phallus length reducer (PLR) for participants with endometriosis and their partners. The investigators hypothesize that both partners will indicate the PLR is acceptable on the self-reported questionnaire.
  • To explore whether an at-home assessment of dyspareunia is an acceptable and valid alternative to clinical measures. The investigators hypothesize that the at-home assessments of dyspareunia will be acceptable to participants and will yield results that are highly correlated with questionnaire-based and clinical assessments of this pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patient

  • 19 to 49 years of age
  • Monogamous sexual partnership
  • Sexually active or not sexually active due to deep dyspareunia
  • Self-reported deep dyspareunia score ≥ 4/10
  • Sexual partner who is willing to participate
  • Willing to engage in penetrative sex at least once during the duration of the study

Partner

  • 19 years of age or older
  • Sexually active with a patient participant who has consented to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Patient

  • Superficial dyspareunia score ≥ 4/10 (This is a potentially confounding variable; the PLR is not expected to affect introital pain)
  • Current use of a PLR
  • Inability to complete English-language questionnaires
  • GAD-7 score ≥ 15
  • PHQ-9 score ≥ 15
  • Intense fear/anxiety in anticipation of, during, or as a result of vaginal intercourse

Partner

  • Current use of a PLR
  • Inability to complete English-language questionnaires

Treatment and study plan

Phallus Length Reducer

Device

Phallus Length Reducer

Other names: OhNut

Self-assessment of dyspareunia

Other

Use of a vaginal insert to self assess dyspareunia

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the phallus length reducer (PLR)

    Time frame: After 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Acceptability of the PLR as measured via questionnaire using a 5 point likert scale (1 = most negative/ worst/ strongly disagree, 5 = most positive/ best/ strongly agree)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of dyspareunia

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, before and after 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Self reported on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain imaginable)

  2. Change in sexual function

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, before and after 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Change in sexual function as measured by Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). This a brief, self-administered questionnaire to assess key dimensions of sexual function in women. The scale consists of 19 items that assess sexual function over the past four weeks and are scored from 1 to 5 (with 1 being the lowest report of desire and 5 being the highest).

  3. Change in sexual distress

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, before and after 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Change in sexual distress as measured in Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) This is a self-administered measure of female personal distress associated with sexual dysfunction. There are 13 questions. The range for each question is 0 (Never) to 4 (Always).

  4. Change in level of general anxiety (GAD-7)

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, before and after 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Change in level of general anxiety as measured using the General Anxiety Disorder - 7 questionnaire. There are 7 questions. The range for each question is 0 (not at all) to 4 (nearly every day).

  5. Change in level of general depression (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Measured at baseline, before and after 6 weeks of using the PLR

    Change in level of general depression as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire- 9 questionnaire. There are 9 questions. The range for each question is 0 (not at all) to 4 (nearly every day).

  6. Acceptability of self-measurement of dyspareunia

    Time frame: After patient self-measurement of dyspareunia is complete (2 times during study)

    Acceptability of self-measurement of dyspareunia will be measured via questionnaire using 5 point likert scale (1 = most negative/ worst/ strongly disagree, 5 = most positive/ best/ strongly agree)

  7. Validity of self-measurement of dyspareunia

    Time frame: Assessment and questionnaire administered 2 times, each one week apart, during the first 4 weeks of the study (to be assessed at week 2 and 3 of participant's menstrual cycle, which may vary)

    Dyspareunia score from the self-measurement will be compared to records of dyspareunia scores from physician performed pelvic exams. (11 point scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain imaginable)

  8. Feasibility - Recruitment

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    The proportion of potentially eligible individuals who were successfully contacted by the study team (response rate); the proportion of contacted individuals who were ineligible, declined to participate, and consented; the number of couples enrolled per month of active recruitment (recruitment rate).

  9. Feasibility - Retention

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    The proportion of enrolled participants who completed the study (retention rate).

  10. Feasibility - Intervention Fidelity

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    To evaluate protocol adherence we documented: the proportion of sexual encounters using the Ohnut per couple in the intervention group during the intervention period (intervention fidelity) and the proportion of missing data.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pathways for Patient-centered Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis-associated Deep Dyspareunia: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
May 1, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.