Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, 2650, Belgium
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Olivier M Vanderveken, MD, PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05267808
The study is designed to develop models to predict site of collapse information using routine polysomnography. In an observational study, the investigators will study 1000 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who have had a recent polysomnographic study and will undergo drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) as part of their standard clinical care. Flow shape information from the polysomnographic study will be associated with the DISE results, and a set of prediction models will be developed and validated to detect the site, pattern and degree of upper airway collapse as seen during DISE.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Edegem, 2650, Belgium
Location status: Recruiting
Olivier M Vanderveken, MD, PhD
CONTACT
The site, pattern and degree of upper airway collapse is associated with the outcome of different OSA therapies. In current clinical practice, this information is assessed during DISE, in which the upper airway is evaluated during a light sedation, mimicking natural sleep. Information on the site of collapse is not currently available from routine clinical sleep studies.
Recent research has shown that the site of upper airway collapse seen during endoscopy can be recognized from the distinct airflow shape patterns. For example, greater "negative effort dependence" (NED) or inspiratory scooping is associated with non-tongue-base sites of collapse. In preliminary analysis using >150 patients, the investigators recently developed a logistic regression model predicting complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp). The model included 6 meaningful airflow features (scoopiness NED, inspiratory skewness, peak flow in early inspiration, inspiratory volume in the first 3rd of inspiration, inspiratory rise time, peak volume). Each feature is calculated as the mean value during identified hypopneas. Other sites of collapse were also assessed using the same six features in separate models (lateral walls, tongue-base, epiglottis).
The study will proceed in two phases of development. In the first phase, the investigators will prospectively validate the preliminary model for predictive CCCP in 300 patients (primary outcome test for phase I). Odds for true CCCP in the predicted CCCP subgroup will be compared against the odds for CCCP in the predicted non-CCCP subgroup (Fisher exact test). Secondary analyses will validate the other three model (lateral walls, tongue-base, epiglottis).
Prior to the second phase, the investigators will develop a refined model to predict CCCP using all available pooled data (N>450). The investigators will seek to include new parameters or incorporate additional interactions between predictors, where appropriate, Refined models for other sites will also be developed. Sensitivity analyses will examine different patterns of collapse (e.g. anterior-posterior), different severities (partial vs complete), how to optimally account for multi-site obstruction, and whether predicted sites are correlated.
In the second phase, the investigators will prospectively apply the refined model to N=700 patients, following the same analytic approach as for phase 1.
Interim analysis will be performed but the study will not be terminated for early success).
Patients will undergo therapies per clinical indication and will be documented; In the entire dataset, the investigators will explore whether the presence of CCCP (per model prediction, and per DISE results) is associated with reduced efficacy of oral appliances, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, positional therapy, greater efficacy of upper airway surgery, greater CPAP pressure requirement, reduced CPAP efficacy, and reduced CPAP adherence. Associations wlil also be performed using other predicted and actual site of collapse information.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endoscopy during drug-induced sleep
Time frame: 1 procedure (outpatient clinic, up to 40 minutes of recording during drug-induced sleep)
Results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy protocol. This protocol will be performed once in every patient. We will examine whether the odds of CCCP is greater in patients with predicted CCCP vs those with a predicted absence of CCCP.
Time frame: 1 procedure (outpatient clinic, up to 40 minutes of recording during drug-induced sleep)
Results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy protocol. This protocol will be performed once in every patient. We will examine whether the odds of tongue base collapse is greater in patients with predicted presence vs absence of tongue base collapse.
Time frame: 1 procedure (outpatient clinic, up to 40 minutes of recording during drug-induced sleep)
Results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy protocol. This protocol will be performed once in every patient. We will examine whether the odds of lateral wall collapse is greater in patients with predicted presence vs absence of lateral wall collapse.
Time frame: 1 procedure (outpatient clinic, up to 40 minutes of recording during drug-induced sleep)
Results of drug-induced sleep endoscopy protocol. This protocol will be performed once in every patient. We will examine whether the odds of lateral wall collapse is greater in patients with predicted presence vs absence of epiglottic collapse.
Time frame: >4 weeks per clinical protocol, average of 3 months
Change in apnea hypopnea index, %baseline
Time frame: >4 weeks per clinical protocol, average of 3 months
Change in apnea hypopnea index, %baseline
Time frame: >4 weeks per clinical protocol, average of 3 months
Change in apnea hypopnea index, %baseline
Time frame: >4 weeks per clinical protocol, average of 3 months
Change in apnea hypopnea index, %baseline
Time frame: After treatment start-up per clinical protocol, on average after 1 night of measurements
Pressure level in cmH2O
Time frame: >4 weeks per clinical protocol, average of 3 months
Average hours per night use
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University Hospital, Antwerp
Other
Prediction of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Outcome From Baseline Diagnostic Data Including Polysomnography
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07273019
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Bron, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07723144
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06390345
Apnea, Body Weight
Boise, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05293600
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details