Nîmes University Hospital
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
NCT Number: NCT06688084
Gram-positive cocci, particularly Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCoN), are the bacteria most frequently isolated from diabetic foot ulcers. Although studies have been carried out on the role of S. aureus in the unfavorable evolution of these wounds, no studies have focused on the role of SCoN. Of the fifty or so SCoN species, not all have the same virulence potential. The role of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi is unknown, yet this bacterium is the 7th most frequently identified in diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting that it may also be involved in the pathophysiology of these infections. At Nîmes University Hospital, this bacterium is mainly identified in samples from diabetic foot ulcers or osteitis in our laboratory and 80% of the bacteria present are in biofilms.It is essential to understand the mechanisms governing these bacterial interactions and establish the true pathogenic potential of these bacteria. Recently, the Nîmes team showed that a strain of S. pettenkoferi (SP165) isolated from foot osteitis in a diabetic patient had real virulence potential. SP165 could not only produce biofilm, but could also survive in human blood, human keratinocytes and murine and human macrophages. It also caused significant embryonic mortality in a zebrafish model. A second study of 29 isolates from Nîmes University Hospital subsequently demonstrated that there were two predominant clones with different virulences. Three biofilm production profiles (rapidly and highly biofilm-producing, slowly biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing) and two zebrafish profiles (highly and moderately lethal) were reported by phenotypic and genomic analyses on this panel of strains. Genes for resistance, virulence and biofilm production were also found on their genomes.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
All sexes
Observational
Nîmes, Gard, 30029, France
Gram-positive cocci, in particular Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (SCoN), are the bacteria most frequently isolated from diabetic foot ulcers. While studies have been carried out on the role of S. aureus in the unfavorable evolution of these wounds, no study has focused on the role of SCoN. Of the fifty or so SCoN species, not all have the same virulence potential. The role of Staphylococcus pettenkoferi is not known. Yet this bacterium is the 7th most frequently identified in diabetic foot ulcers, suggesting that it may also be involved in the pathophysiology of these infections. In the work of Loetsche et al. a study of the microbiome of 349 diabetic foot ulcer samples by targeted 16S rDNA sequencing showed that the genus Staphylococcus was the most abundant, with a relative abundance of 22.8%, including 13.3% S. aureus and 5.3% S. pettenkoferi.
At Nîmes University Hospital, this bacterium is mainly identified in samples from diabetic foot ulcers or osteitis in our laboratory (89 isolations of S. pettenkoferi from diabetic foot ulcer samples out of 167 isolations made of this bacterium between 2018 and 2022).The difficulty of managing chronic wounds also lies in the fact that almost 80% of the bacteria present are in biofilms. It has also been established that the environment in which bacteria are found, and in particular the interactions they establish between themselves, play a significant role in delayed wound healing. It is therefore essential to understand the mechanisms governing these bacterial interactions and to establish the true pathogenic potential of these bacteria.
Recently, our team demonstrated that a strain of S. pettenkoferi (SP165) isolated from foot osteitis in a diabetic patient had real virulence potential. As well as being able to produce biofilm, SP165 was able to survive in human blood, human keratinocytes and murine and human macrophages. It also demonstrated its virulence by causing significant embryonic mortality in the zebrafish model.
A second study of 29 isolates from Nîmes University Hospital subsequently demonstrated the existence of two predominant clones with different virulences.
Three biofilm production profiles (rapidly and highly biofilm-producing, slowly biofilm-producing and non-biofilm-producing) and two zebrafish virulence profiles (highly and moderately lethal) were reported by phenotypic and genomic analyses on this panel of strains. Genes for resistance, virulence and biofilm production were also found on their genomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Next-generation genomic sequencing (MICRO&BIO platform, MiSeq, Illumina) and bioinformatics analyses. After validating data quality, genomes will be re-assembled using Spades software (version 3.15.4) and CLC® (Qiagen), then compared with the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database. They will also be analysed on the online Type-Strain Genomes Server platform to accurately identify the bacteria. Genome annotation will be done using the DDBJ Fast Annotation and Submission Tool. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) analysis based on the alignment of whole genomes and core-genomes will be carried out using version 7 of MAFFT (multiple alignment using fast Fourier transform) software, then quantified using snp-dists (version 0.6.3). This approach will enable the molecular epidemiology of the collection of strains in France and other European countries to be clarified, and the main circulating clades to be assessed, particularly depending on the origin of samples.
The resistome will be assessed by identifying known and described resistance genes in staphylococci using bioinformatics analyses of sequenced complete bacterial genomes. A search for plasmids will also be made using various specific software packages (ResFinder, CARD, PointFinder, Plasmidfinder, in-house pipeline).
The virulome of the strains will be studied based on the genomic sequencing data obtained and with reference to the literature on Staphylococci. Various specific software packages (Pathogenfinder, Virulencefinder, in-house pipeline) will be used for this purpose.
Antibiotic resistance will be assessed using a Sensititer® plate (Thermo ScientificTM, Illkirch) to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration of isolates against a series of antibiotics commonly used for S. pettenkoferi infections, including new molecules currently on the market or in development, such as Ceftaroline, Ceftobiprole, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Minimum inhibitory concentration values will be interpreted in accordance with the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the Société Française de Microbiologie (https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/2021/04/23/casfm-avril-2021-v1-0/).
Different strains of S. pettenkoferi isolated from foot osteitis in diabetic patients and non-diabetic osteitis will be selected according to the clades identified and phenotypically characterised by further analysis:
Three strains of S. pettenkoferi isolated from foot osteitis in diabetic patients will be selected on the basis of the clades identified and the study of the virulome in order to be analysed on :
These models were developed at the MICRO&BIO Platform and the INSERM 1047 VBIC unit.
Time frame: Day 0 to 3 months
Number of clades estimated via typing by complete sequencing of the bacterial genomes of all S. pettenkoferi strains and analysis of phylogenetic distances (whole genome and core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms).
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
Number of clades estimated via typing by complete sequencing of the bacterial genomes of all Staphylococcus pettenkoferi strains and analysis of phylogenetic distances.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of antibiotic resistance genes (resistome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of virulence genes (virulome) will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 3 - 6 months
The presence of plasmids will be identified by bioinformatics analysis of sequenced bacterial genomes.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics will be recorded (antibiograms of isolates).These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Minimum inhibitory concentration for a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiograms will be established on newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Biofilm formation index in the presence/absence of a series of antibiotics (antibiograms of isolates). These antibiotics will be newly-marketed or current molecules such as Ceftarolin, Ceftobiprol, Dalbavancin, Delafloxacin, Tedizolid and Oritavancin. Results recorded on a scale ranging from 0 = biofilm and 12 = no biofilm
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
Bacterial growth curve by measuring absorbance on bacterial culture over time.
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The rate of internalisation and release of LDH (a sign of cellular toxicity of the bacterial isolate) in an in vitro osteoblast cell culture model (MC3T3-E1)
Time frame: 6 - 14 months
The amount of intracellular bacterial multiplication will be assessed in an in vitro macrophage cell culture model (RAW 264.7).
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Survival curve at 48 hours
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Survival curve at 48 hours
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Survival curve at 48 hours
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Survival curve at 48 hours
Time frame: Up to 48 hours
Survival curve at 48 hours
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Evaluation of Pathogenicity Factors of Staphylococcus Pettenkoferi in Foot Wounds and Osteitis in Diabetic Patients
Acronym: PETTENK-OS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00659646
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Lakeland, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07674420
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06760416
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Izmir, Buca, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05804097
Amputation, Cardiovascular Diseases
Amsterdam, Noord-Hollad, Netherlands
View Trial Details