St Cloud Hospital
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06390423
In the critically ill population, fluid administration in an unstable patient is perhaps the most common intervention that is performed. Uncorrected hypovolemia with inappropriate vasopressors lead to organ hypoperfusion where as overzealous fluid administration especially in ARDS (Adult respiratory distress syndrome) can increase mortality. It has been estimated that only 50% of hemodynamically unstable critically ill patients are volume responsive, hence dynamic assessment of preload responsiveness has been proposed to better identify those individuals who would benefit from fluid bolus.
Interested in participating?
Request Info30 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Fluid responsiveness in patients with moderate to severe ARDS is crucial, as additional unnecessary fluid may be harmful. Various techniques of hemodynamic assessment exist, each with its own advantages and limitations. This study compares different techniques of preload responsiveness that include passive leg raise (PLR) and mini-fluid challenge induced changes in Pulse pressure variation (PPV), End tidal CO2, Bioreactance based Stroke volume index (SVI) and velocity time integral (VTI) on Echocardiogram.
Study protocol :
Baseline Echo with VTI will be obtained Bed side monitor will be set to display PPV and end tidal CO2 Baxter Starling system will be connected to the patient All baseline values will be recorded Tidal volume will be temporarily adjusted to 8 ml/kg , which will be reverted back to 6ml/kg after the measurements. This has proven to be a safe maneuver.
All the above hemodynamic assessments will be performed for eligible patients by measuring before and after PLR and repositioning to baseline. VTI will be estimated by bed side Echocardiogram. SVI will be estimated using the Starling system (Baxter). PPV and End tidal CO2 will be recorded from the bed side monitors.
Fluid responsiveness is presumed with a change in VTI of 10%. For these patients a mini-fluid challenge of 250 cc of crystalloids (NS, RL or Normosol) will be given over 10 min and PPV, VTI, End tidal CO2 and SVI will be recorded before and after fluid challenge. Patients with VTI change of < 10%, as non-responders, who will also be included in the analysis for assessment of reliability using the ROC curves. hemodynamic assessments and repeated fluid challenge will be considered as needed. Stability of vasopressor dose with maximum of 500 cc of crystalloid will be considered as positive fluid responder. This cohort of patients will be considered as gold standard for preload responsiveness and will be categorized based on a nominal scale. Patients who need higher vasopressor support despite 1L of crystalloid within 3 hours will be considered fluid non-responders.
Data collection:
De-identified data will be recorded. Age, BMI ( body mass index), Charleston co-morbidity index, baseline PPV, End-tidal CO2, SVI, VTI, post PLR, post fluid challenge, return to baseline, PF ratio, PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure), SOFA (sequential organ function assessment) Score on the day of the test will be recorded.
Statistical Analysis:
Microsoft Excel will be used to record data on an institutional computer. Once the data is collected, it will be exported for statistical analysis. Jamovi will be utilized for statistical analysis. Baseline characteristics will be compared using a T-test if normative distribution or non-parametric test such as Mann Whitney U test. Reliability and accuracy will be detected using ROC curve assessment. In addition, the Youden index approach will be utilized to identify cut-offs of each of the variables and their change. (PPV, SVI,VTI and End tidal CO2). All the delta values will be compared with pearson correlation with a scatter plot and line of identity. Agreement between variables will be done using Bland-Altman analysis. If necessary, values will be transformed into Z scores. For all comparisons, a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No interventions other than fluid challenge
Time frame: 3 hours after the initial passive leg raise
We shall assess the need for vasopressor dose e.g nor-epinephrine dose. If the dose remains constant after fluid bolus until 3 hours, we shall consider them fluid resposive. If the dose requirement goes up despite fluid bolus, we shall label them fluid un-responsive
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
CentraCare
Other
Passive Leg Raise and Mini-fluid Challenge Effect on Various Cardiac Output Surrogates Such as Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV), End-tidal CO2 (Carbon Dioxide), Bioreactance (Stroke Volume Index -SVI) and Velocity Time Integral on Echocardiographic Exam for Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Moderately Severe ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Acronym: PHOENIX
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06981221
Fluid Responsiveness, Hysterectomy
Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07546656
Acute Circulatory Failure, Fluid Responsiveness
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07009665
Critical Care, Fluid Resuscitation, Emergency Medicine
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06593717
ARDS, ECMO Treatment
Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details