Ersta Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT04436159
Short-term follow up after surgery of para-esophageal hernia comparing two different types of fundoplication
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, Sweden
Laparoscopic para-esophageal hernia (PEH) repair has been established as a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic patients. Today, most surgeons agree that a fundoplication should be included in the hiatal reconstruction in order to reduce the risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and hernia recurrence. However, what type of wrap that should be recommend is yet to be determined.
One might argue that the overall durability and effectiveness of a partial fundoplication in the control of reflux might be less reliable than a total wrap, but on the contrary, the latter carries the risk of inducing a pseudoachalasia similar situation in PEH patients.
We therefore designed a double blind randomized clinical trial in which patients with symptomatic paraesophageal hernia to receive either a posterior partial (Toupet) or total (Nissen) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair.
Six months follow up with questionnaires, 24-hour pH monitoring and radiology after surgery of para-esophageal hernia with addition of total fundoplication vs posterial partial fundoplication.
Dysphagia Scores; Ogilvie dysphagia score and Watson dysphagia score. Quality of Life; SF-36: physical and mental component scores.
Time points: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A total fundoplication was constructed in which the right and left part of the wrap was brought together in front of, and slightly to the right of the esophagus, and sutured with three interrupted stitches of 2-0 unabsorbable sutures from the GEJ and cranially to attain a length between the top and bottom sutures of at the most 2 cm. At least one wrap suture included the esophageal muscle-wall.
The wrap was pulled dorsally around the distal part of the esophagus and GEJ, which was encircled approximately 180-200 degrees. First, the wrap was anchored with Gore-tex sutures, dorsally to the left crus with 3 sutures and then to the right crus with another 3 sutures.
Finally, the wrap was completed with 3-4 sutures, between the edges of the wrap and the right and left side of the esophageal wall, respectively.
Time frame: 6 months
The Ogilvie dysphagia score is a 5-graded scale 0-4 defined as follows: '0', ability to eat ordinary diet; '1', ability to swallow solid food; '2', ability to swallow semisolids; '3', ability to swallow liquids; '4', total inability to swallow .
Time frame: 6 mohths
Peri and postoperative complications.
Time frame: 6 months
postoperative length of hospital stay
Time frame: 6 months
Watson dysphagia score is a validated instrument for benign dysphagia where the patient is asked whether he/she always, sometimes or never has difficulty swallowing nine different groups of liquid and food items.
This gives a score ranging from zero to 45, where 45 represents the worst possible dysphagia.
Time frame: 6 months
24-hour pH monitoring
Time frame: 6 months
The Swedish version of this validated global questionnaire is presented as physical and mental summary component scores (PCS and MCS, respectively). Each subscale scores reaches a value of at the most 100, where higher values reflect better health status.
Time frame: 6 months
Radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia
Karolinska University Hospital
Other
Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01776827
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01587859
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Bologna, BO, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07659080
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01799967
Achalasia, Deglutition Disorders
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details