Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences
Tilburg, 5037 AB, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT05539170
This randomized controlled microtrial, not just focus on parental (and child) responsiveness but also on an underlying physiological mechanism hypothesized to contribute to heightened susceptibility to parenting interventions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tilburg, 5037 AB, Netherlands
After being informed about the study, all participants giving written informed consent will be randomly assigned to the "micro" intervention condition (i.e., immediate positive parenting feedback) or care-as-usual control condition in a singe-blind manner in a 1:1 ratio.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Individual positive feedback concerning their parenting and their child's behavior.
Time frame: Parenting change: baseline (pretest), after 2 weeks (posttest), and after 4 weeks (follow-up)
This 25-item scale is related to five domain-specific SEB factors: Discipline, Nurturance, Playing, Instrumental Care, and Teaching. Self-efficacy beliefs in parenting can be evaluated as a quantitative construct by asking parents their beliefs in specific parenting activities, such as teaching, playing, providing instrumental care, nurturing or disciplining their child. Items are in the form of affirmatives, for example: ''I am able to sense when my child is starting to become distressed'' for the Nurturance subscale. The items will be rated on a 5-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).
Time frame: Parenting change: baseline (pretest), after 2 weeks (posttest), and after 4 weeks (follow-up)
This questionnaire consists of 25 items and comprises five subscales: Positive parenting (e.g., "I make time to listen to my child, when he/she wants to tell me something"), Discipline (e.g., "When my child has been disobedient, I give him/her a chore as punishment"), Harsh Punishment (e.g., "I spank my child when he/she is disobedient or naughty"), Material Rewarding (e.g., "I give my child candy as a reward for good behavior"), and Rule Setting (e.g., "I teach my child to be polite at school"). A 5-point scale is provided for each item, ranging from 1 = (almost) never to 5 = (almost) always.
Time frame: Parenting change: baseline/pretest observation at lab (before intervention) and posttest observation at same labvisit (after intervention)
The Crowell observation task takes 20 minutes to complete and consists of four episodes: warm-up, free play, frustration task, and recovery time. The parent scales (i.e., positive affect, autonomy support, negative affect, withdrawal, controlling behavior and laxness/inconsistent) are each internally consistent and well-defined conceptually. High internal consistency for each scale provides support for the reliability of the rating scale, and suggests that the Crowell scores can be useful as scale to measure caregiver responsiveness, but also collectively as a total score assessing overall relational functioning.
Time frame: Change in child behavior: baseline (pretest), after 2 weeks (posttest), and after 4 weeks (follow-up)
One subscale assessing the degree to which child externalizing problem is a problem from the 36-item Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) will be used to assess the occurrence of child externalizing problem behavior. This "Intensity" subscale measures frequency of externalizing behavior in children aged 2 to 16 years and has been shown to be a reliable (screening) instrument (3). Example items are: "Does not obey house rules" and "Whines."
Time frame: Change in child behavior: baseline/pretest observation at lab (before intervention) and posttest observation at same labvisit (after intervention)
The Crowell observation task takes 20 minutes to complete and consists of four episodes: warm-up, free play, frustration task, and recovery time. The child scales (i.e., positive affect, persistence/enthusiasms, irritability/negative affect, and noncompliance) are each internally consistent and well-defined conceptually. High internal consistency for each scale provides support for the reliability of the rating scale, and suggests that the Crowell scores can be useful as scale to measure child's affective presentation, but also collectively as a total score assessing overall relational functioning.
Tilburg University
Other
Parents' Differential Susceptibility to a Randomized Controlled Microtrial: The Role of Physiological Signals as Underlying Mechanism
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04802291
Behavior, Body Weight
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06417918
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Adolescent Problem Behavior
Eldoret, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT05909670
Behavior, Child Behavior
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03360201
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Adolescent Problem Behavior
Eldoret, Uasin Gishu County, Kenya
View Trial Details