Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05032742

Parenting Stress mHealth

Parenting stress is a well-documented barrier to youth engagement in community-based substance use treatment. The current project aims to develop and evaluate a mobile health parenting stress intervention for caregivers of justice-involved youth, a population with high rates of substance use and low rates of treatment engagement.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Conditions

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

UCSF Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital

San Francisco, California, 94131, United States

About this study

Justice-involved youth exhibit high rates of substance use and mental health symptoms, yet few receive treatment during detention or community re-entry. Once released into the community, caregivers must facilitate youth's treatment engagement, mobilizing significant resources and facing many barriers (e.g., transportation, mistrust) to do so. Parenting stress, which is heightened during youth detention and community reentry, is associated with greater perceived barriers to treatment, less youth therapeutic change throughout treatment, and premature treatment dropout. Addressing parenting stress improves youth treatment engagement and outcomes among youth exhibiting antisocial behavior, yet given the many barriers to treatment, novel approaches to intervention are needed; mobile health (mHealth) technology is one promising approach. Caregivers of justice-involved youth and system stakeholders are interested in mHealth treatment and mHealth addresses instrumental barriers (e.g., transportation) to treatment. Advances in technology and community engaged research allow for active stakeholder collaboration in mHealth application development, with no technological expertise required, through participatory informatics; caregiver involvement increases the likelihood the intervention will be relevant and efficacious. The purpose of this mixed-methods K23 study is to 1) develop a mHealth parenting stress intervention using participatory informatics; 2) assess the feasibility and acceptability of the participatory informatics approach and the intervention; 3) evaluate the intervention's preliminary efficacy in reducing parenting stress and increasing youth engagement in substance use or dual diagnosis treatment post-detention through a pilot randomized controlled trial; and 4) understand systems-level factors that could influence eventual system adoption and sustainability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The following is a description for the inclusion criteria for aims 1 and 2 for caregivers participating in this research study.

Eligible caregivers must be the parent or legal guardian of a youth who is:

  • currently detained in a juvenile detention center or correctional facility, mandated by the juvenile justice system to a congregate out-of-home placement (e.g., group home);
  • 12-17 years old;
  • has an identified substance use or substance use and co-occurring mental health need;
  • and is scheduled to be released into the community to the care of the enrolled caregiver.

The following is a description for the inclusion criteria for aim 3 for system stakeholders participating in this research study.

Eligible behavioral health providers (e.g., substance use counselor) must:

  • Provide substance use or dual diagnosis treatment justice-involved youth and their caregivers,
  • be over 18 years old,
  • and speak English fluently.

Eligible juvenile probation officers must be:

  • 18 years or older
  • and speak fluent English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

for all participants includes:

  • lack of proficiency in English
  • and cognitive impairment or active psychosis which precludes provision of informed consent.

Caregivers who do not have access to a device with internet access will also not be eligible as this would preclude them from being able to participate in the mHealth intervention.

Treatment and study plan

mHealth parenting stress app

Behavioral

mHealth parenting stress app intervention to reduce parenting stress and improving youth community-based treatment engagement.

Primary outcomes

  1. Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Mindful Parenting)

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    The Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale is an 8-item self-report of mindful parenting, including four sub-scales reflecting present-centered emotional awareness in parenting, present-centered attention in parenting, non-reactivity/low reactivity in parenting, and non-judgmental acceptance in parenting that will be used to measure mindful parenting as a construct. Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 scale and items are summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=8 to 40); higher scores indicate greater mindful parenting.

  2. Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Mindful Parenting)

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    The Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale is an 8-item self-report of mindful parenting, including four sub-scales reflecting present-centered emotional awareness in parenting, present-centered attention in parenting, non-reactivity/low reactivity in parenting, and non-judgmental acceptance in parenting that will be used to measure mindful parenting as a construct. Each item is rated on a 1 to 5 scale and items are summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=8 to 40); higher scores indicate greater mindful parenting.

  3. Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (Parenting Stress)

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    The Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) is a 90-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and summed to create sub-scale scores; higher scores reflect greater parenting stress.

  4. Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (Parenting Stress)

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    The Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) is a 90-item self-report measure of parenting stress. Items are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and summed to create sub-scale scores (possible range=90 to 450); higher scores reflect greater parenting stress.

  5. Parenting Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) is a 20-item assessment of caregivers' perceived parenting ability across 3 dimensions: parental connection, behavioral influence, and psychological autonomy and used to measure parenting self-efficacy. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 10 (possible range=0 to 200) with higher scores reflecting greater parenting self-efficacy.

  6. Parenting Self-Efficacy

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES) is a 20-item assessment of caregivers' perceived parenting ability across 3 dimensions: parental connection, behavioral influence, and psychological autonomy and used to measure parenting self-efficacy. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 10 (possible range=0 to 200) with higher scores reflecting greater parenting self-efficacy.

  7. Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (Barriers to Youth Treatment)

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the use of behavioral health services by children ages 8 years to 17 years. The CASA includes 31 settings covering inpatient, outpatient, and informal services provided by a variety of child-serving providers and sectors. This instrument collects information on whether a service was ever used, as well as more detailed information (length of stay/number of visits, focus of treatment) on services used in the recent past. Select items from the CASA will assess 16 barriers to youths' services use (e.g., language, transportation, cost, stigma). Caregivers will report whether each barrier was a concern during the 3 months prior to the youths' detention or for follow-ups, in the 3 months since the last assessment (6 months post baseline).

  8. Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (Barriers to Youth Treatment)

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    The Child and Adolescent Services Assessment (CASA) is a parent-report instrument designed to assess the use of behavioral health services by children ages 8 years to 17 years. The CASA includes 31 settings covering inpatient, outpatient, and informal services provided by a variety of child-serving providers and sectors. This instrument collects information on whether a service was ever used, as well as more detailed information (length of stay/number of visits, focus of treatment) on services used in the recent past. Select items from the CASA will assess 16 barriers to youths' services use (e.g., language, transportation, cost, stigma). Caregivers will report whether each barrier was a concern during the 3 months prior to the youths' detention or for follow-ups, in the 3 months since the last assessment (6 months post baseline).

  9. Motivation for Youth Treatment

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS) is an 8-item measure of intrinsic motivation for youth treatment and assesses a youth and caregiver's problem recognition and treatment readiness. Responses are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and are summed to yield two sub-scale scores (problem recognition: possible range=3 to 15; treatment readiness: possible range=5 to 25). Higher scores reflect higher motivation.

  10. Motivation for Youth Treatment

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    Motivation for Youth's Treatment Scale (MYTS) is an 8-item measure of intrinsic motivation for youth treatment and assesses a youth and caregiver's problem recognition and treatment readiness. Responses are rated on a 1 to 5 scale and are summed to yield two sub-scale scores (problem recognition: possible range=3 to 15; treatment readiness: possible range=5 to 25). Higher scores reflect higher motivation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Youth Treatment Engagement

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    Caregiver report on whether youth initiated substance use, mental health, dual diagnosis, or family based treatment in the community (i.e., scheduled appointment, attended first appointment), treatment retention (i.e., number of sessions attended) is collected to measure youth treatment engagement. Caregiver report will also provide information on whether the youth complied with treatment mandated by the juvenile court (e.g., probation requirement).

  2. Youth Treatment Engagement

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    Caregiver report on whether youth initiated substance use, mental health, dual diagnosis, or family based treatment in the community (i.e., scheduled appointment, attended first appointment), treatment retention (i.e., number of sessions attended) is collected to measure youth treatment engagement. Caregiver report will also provide information on whether the youth complied with treatment mandated by the juvenile court (e.g., probation requirement).

Other outcomes

  1. Caregiver Mental Health & Substance Use

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory is a 23-item self-report assessment of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mania, psychosis) and substance use during the past 2 weeks; 1 item regarding suicidal ideation was removed. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 4 (possible range=0 to 88). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.

  2. Caregiver Mental Health & Substance Use

    Time frame: 6 months post baseline

    DSM-5 Cross Cutting Symptom Inventory is a 23-item self-report assessment of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, mania, psychosis) and substance use during the past 2 weeks; 1 item regarding suicidal ideation was removed. Items are rated on a scale from 0 to 4 (possible range=0 to 88). Higher scores reflect greater symptom severity.

  3. mHealth Application Acceptability

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    Completed by the intervention condition only, the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire for Standalone mHealth Apps is a 21-item self-report assessment of the acceptability (i.e., ease of use, interface and satisfaction, usefulness) of the mHealth application. Items are rated on a scale from 1 to 4 (possible range=21 to 84). Higher scores reflect greater acceptability of the mobile health app intervention.

  4. Caregiver Qualitative Interview

    Time frame: 3 months post baseline

    These interviews will assess caregivers' perception of their relationship with their youth during their study involvement, as well as their feedback about whichever condition they were randomly assigned to, either the RAISE app or brochure.

  5. Youth Qualitative Interview

    Time frame: After youth's release to the community within study period (estimated 2 years or less)

    Youth will be eligible to participate in a one-time qualitative interview if they have been released into the community while the study is being conducted. Youth interviews will assess their perceptions of support received from their caregiver, their caregiver's stress, and the role of their caregiver in facilitating connection to services.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Registry information

Official study title

Reducing Parenting Stress to Facilitate Justice-Involved Youth's Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 2, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.