Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04741568

Parent Intervention to Prevent Disordered Eating in Children With Type 1 Diabetes

A recent Diabetes UK Position Statement identified several key gaps in the evidence base that might improve mental wellbeing for people with diabetes; one of which was supporting people with diabetes and eating disorders. There is evidence indicating that disordered eating may be more prevalent in children and young people (CYP). Additionally, there is mounting supporting evidence for family-based treatments in both anorexia and bulimia. This study proposes to develop a psycho-education intervention for parents of CYP with Type 1 diabetes (T1D), which will include a one-day workshop with online, downloadable content, and to assess the feasibility of this intervention. Parents will be asked to complete questionnaires about eating habits, diabetes management (both behaviour and knowledge) and wellbeing at three time-points (baseline, one-month and three-months postintervention). Children will also be asked to complete measures on diabetes eating problems at the same time intervals. Parents randomised to the intervention arm will be invited to take part in a semi-structured interview and all parents will be invited to feedback on their participation. It is hypothesised that a psycho-education intervention aimed at parents will help prevent disordered eating in CYP with T1D and improve parental wellbeing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

A recent Diabetes UK Position Statement identified several key gaps in the evidence base that might help improve mental wellbeing for people with diabetes, one of which was supporting people with diabetes and eating disorders. The position statement recommends focusing on people in general, citing studies which observe that 30% of women with T1D omit insulin to control their weight. However, there is evidence indicating that disordered eating may be more prevalent in CYP. A recent meta-analysis found that clinical eating disorders (i.e. anorexia and bulimia) and maladaptive eating and dieting practices (fasting, binge eating, self-induced vomiting, abuse of laxatives, diet pills or other medications including intentional insulin omission - diabulimia) were more prevalent in CYP with T1D (7.0% and 39.3% respectively) than those without T1D (2.7% and 32.5%).

Management of T1D places an inherent focus on dietary intake, specifically carbohydrate counting, physical activity, regular blood sugar monitoring and correct and timely administration of insulin based on these factors. Many high carbohydrate foods can be perceived as 'bad' for blood glucose levels and are subsequently avoided or prohibited within families. This can lead to tensions between CYP and their parents, where CYP may be chastised for eating particular foods or for eating 'forbidden' foods in secret. Additionally, treatment and avoidance of hypoglycaemic episodes can add further complexities to a CYP with T1D's relationship with food, as they may overeat during hypos or save restricted or forbidden foods for hypo treatment. Some CYP may also be discouraged from participating in sport activities due to concerns about a potential hypoglycaemic event. Additionally, depending on age and pre-diagnosis symptoms of T1D, some CYP may also have experienced significant weight loss pre-diagnosis that was quickly regained upon starting insulin treatment; this may provide evidence to CYP that insulin causes them to gain unwanted body weight.

Whilst systematic reviews and meta-analyses exist on the prevalence of eating problems and diabetes as well as associations between eating problems and glycaemic control, the focus of interventions for CYP with T1D has been on the improvement of psychological distress and long-term glycaemic control. Although some interventions included in these reviews have focused on family therapy, they did not explicitly target disordered eating and none were based in the UK. More recently published parenting interventions also do not address disordered eating. Therefore, due to this paucity of evidence for existing interventions, the evidence-base for interventions for clinical eating disorders not specific to T1D is reviewed instead.

The rationale for focusing on interventions aimed at parents is that parents are more responsive to psychological interventions than their offspring. Furthermore, studies have highlighted the protective influence of parents for CYP with clinical eating disorders with family-based treatments playing a key role in supporting CYP in their recovery. Families are a resource in the treatment of eating disorders in CYP and there is mounting evidence that supports family-based treatments in both anorexia and bulimia. Mobilisation of the family system as a resource and an emphasis on promoting specific change early on in treatment in eating disorder-related behaviours have been found to be key elements. The involvement of parents is a key recommendation in the NICE guidelines for eating disorders. Additionally, the Access and Waiting Times Standard for CYP with eating disorders emphasises the necessity of rapid and effective treatment for CYP, along with their families and carers.

Parent-focused psychoeducation groups can be a useful tool to support early change in the treatment of eating disorders. A parent-focused psychoeducation group has been developed at a specialist CYP Eating Disorder service with the aim of offering treatment within a timely manner that promoted early change. The programme is based on key principles from the parenting programme literature and the evidence base for the treatment of eating disorders. Emerging evidence from this group indicated significant positive effects and highlighted that parents benefitted most from the information about managing their CYP's eating disorder and meeting other parents. Another recent evaluation found the group to be an effective source of support for parents, improved their confidence and knowledge in managing their child's eating disorder and their ability to manage their child's adherence to meal plans.

Therefore, it is evident that the involvement of parents could be crucial to facilitate recovery in CYP with eating disorders. Less specific to eating disorders, a recent review of parental interventions to prevent body dissatisfaction or eating disorders in CYP also found encouraging results.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parent or primary caregiver of a CYP aged between 11-14 years with a diagnosis of T1D
  • Willing to attend group intervention and provide consent
  • Fluent in English or Welsh

Exclusion criteria

  • Parent receiving psychological support for their child's diabetes and disordered eating
  • Parent diagnosis of severe mental health or learning difficulty
  • Participating in another trial
  • Unable to speak or understand English or Welsh

Treatment and study plan

Parental psychoeducational Intervention

Behavioral

The psychoeducation intervention for parents will focus on providing skills, knowledge and support motivation for caregivers of children with diabetes.

A brief (one-day or two half days) workshop, and a website with downloadable content will be made available to review and refresh any skills and techniques.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Diabetes Eating Problem Survey Revised (Markowitz et al., 2010)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    A child and parent reported survey of eating problems. Responses are scored on a 6-point Likert scale and higher scores indicate greater eating disorder pathology.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in child HbA1c

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    Parent reported HbA1c of children

  2. Change in Body Mass Index (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    Parent reported weight and height of children used to calculate BMI

  3. Change in Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey Parent Revised (Markowitz et al., 2012)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    A parent-reported survey to assess diabetes related distress, higher scores indicate greater diabetes distress.

  4. Change in Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (Tennant et al., 2007)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    A self report survey to assess parental mental wellbeing. Scores range from 14 to 70 and higher scores indicate greater positive mental wellbeing.

  5. Change in Psychological Determinants

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    Information Motivation Behvaioural Skills model questionnaire devised for this study completed by parents

  6. Intervention Feedback Survey

    Time frame: 3 months

    Satisfaction and experience with intervention survey devised for this study

  7. Change in Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (Wardle et al. 2001)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1-month and 3-months

    A parent rated instrument to assess eight dimensions of eating style in children. Includes 35 items rates on a 5-point scale, higher scores indicate greater child behaviour for each dimension (e.g. emotional overeating, enjoyment of food).

Other outcomes

  1. Demographics

    Time frame: Baseline

    Parent completed T1D clinical characteristics and healthcare utilisation survey devised for this study (child age, gender, years with diagnosis, number of hospital visits in the last year)

  2. Feasibility Outcomes: Number of Participants Invited to the Study

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of parents invited to the study

  3. Feasibility Outcomes: Number of Participants Interested in Participating in the Study

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of Participants Interested in Participating in the Study

  4. Feasibility Outcomes: Number of parents meeting eligibility criteria

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of parents meeting eligibility criteria

  5. Feasibility Outcomes: Number of parents recruited and participating in the intervention

    Time frame: 3 months

    Number of parents recruited and participate in the intervention

  6. Feasibility Outcomes: Completion Rates (will be calculated from number of parents recruited, number of parents completing the intervention)

    Time frame: 3 months

    We look at the number of enrolled parents who have completed the intervention divided by the total number of parents who have completed the intervention or withdrawn or cancelled.

  7. Feasibility Outcomes: Retention Rates (will be calculated from number of parents recruited and participating in the intervention)

    Time frame: 3 months

    The total number of parents students (including any who have withdrawn), minus the number of parents who have withdrawn or cancelled their enrollment, and divide this by the total number of enrolled parents.

  8. Feasibility Outcomes: Usability of Online Content (Google Analytics)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Analysis on usability of online content. Data obtained from Google Analytics (e.g. website traffic, session duration, pages per session)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Surrey

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Development and Feasibility of a Parent Intervention to Prevent Disordered Eating in Children and Young People With Type 1 Diabetes

Acronym: PRIORITY

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Feb 5, 2021
Registry last updated
May 12, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.