BACKGROUND:
For parents of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), the primary concern is to minimize the impact of the disorder, likely through evidence-based intervention. The secondary concern is whether any intervention prescribed is affordable and the logistics of completion feasible. This project will obtain evidence for ASD intervention options that have different costs and intervention delivery formats (individual vs. group) to evaluate whether a more costly option is more effective at the study level. The investigators will then develop a predict-to-prescribe approach that informs parents which intervention option would likely be most cost-effective in light of each family's unique characteristics (i.e., effectiveness at the individual-child level). [We use the term "parents" to mean caregivers throughout this protocol.]
ASD affects 14 per 10,000 (0.14%) children in Hong Kong and 39.23 per 10,000 in Mainland China. Social communication is a deficit domain of ASD, and about 29% of preschoolers with ASD have severe verbal deficits. Intervention through pharmaceutical means remains elusive, leaving behavioral interventions the most realistic and immediate avenue of treatment. This project will focus on enhancing the cost-effectiveness of behavioral intervention that targets language and communication. The investigators will do so in the context of precision medicine, in which the investigators aim to identify the most cost-effective intervention for the individual child with ASD.
AIM OF STUDY:
Objective 1: The investigators will first ascertain whether parent-implemented communication treatment taught by a speech therapist in an Individual (one-on-one) format is more effective than treatment taught in a Group format (up to 8 families learning together) at the study level.
Objective 2: The investigators will examine pre-treatment child and parent variables simultaneously and construct predictive models of response to the two treatment options (group, less costly vs. individual, more costly) at the individual-child level. Both neural and non-neural variables will be examined to increase the precision of prediction.
HYPOTHESIS:
By the investigators' estimate, even after the number of contact hours is controlled, the group format is at least 4 times cheaper than the one-on-one format. Individual sessions allow for individualization, clearer explanation and modeling of the strategies, as well as some clinician-to-child stimulations that cannot be achieved by lectures. Though it may seem obvious that this individual format must produce better results, it is possible that the group format may be more effective due to better social support offered by peers.