Parametric Imaging
Procedure2 parametric PET (one at the inclusion and one at 42 gray of the beginning of radiotherapy)
NCT Number: NCT02821936
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance between Positron E mission tomography parametric imaging versus standard PET for the 1 year prognosis of patients with NSCLC treated by radiochemotherapy.
The ancillary study will evaluate the interest of parametric PET imaging during the treatment (around 42 Gray) to detect the local relapse of the lesion in order to propose a treatment re-planification or intensification (not realized on the present study).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
APHM, Marseille, France
In oncology, Positron Emission Tomography imaging with 18Fluor-FDG quantifies glucose metabolism lesions. Conventionally, the metabolism is quantified using the Standard Uptake Value (SUV) from a static acquisition obtained 60 minutes post-injection. Some teams reported SUV variation coefficients as high as 30% in NSCLC lesions for repeated PET examinations in patients without treatment. Moreover, information regarding the binding kinetics of 18Fluor-FDG by tumor cells is not accessible through this method.
Much more elaborated FDG quantification methods and considered as reference methods exist in PET imaging (compartmental analysis, Patlak). Simplified kinetic methods have also been proposed which correlate better with Patlak reference method than the conventional SUV. The investigators proposed a new methodological approach to obtain the parametric information in PET. This approach allows to define new indexes (average percentage of FDG-metabolized or not metabolized; time required to metabolize 80% of FDG). The approach has been clinically evaluated in a pilot study for the differentiation between benign and paraganglioma lesions.
Tsuchida observed that the parametric PET imaging allowed histological differentiation of subtypes of lung tumors, reflecting the difference in glucose transporters and hexokinase between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Xue et al showed that the FDG uptake (based on the only SUV) could be a tool to predict the subtype and thus tumor staging in patients suffering from NSCLC.
The investigators can then hypothesize that some subtype of lung tumor, with increased proliferation rate (kinetic indexes k3, Ki or other parameters offered by our previous work), will be more sensitive to radiotherapy and thus the evaluation of tumor subtype by PET would allows radiotherapy adaption accordingly.
This study is a preliminary methodological study , strictly descriptive and will only assess the comparison of measurements obtained on a parametric imaging and imaging "static" in patients suffering from NSCLC . The measures of the uptake and volumes estimated by two approaches will be correlated and compared with the 1 year clinical outcome (primary objective).
An ancillary study will assess the relevance of the approach to detect, at the tumor level , an early recurrence of the disease. For this, the images acquired during the radiotherapy treatment (at 42Gy) will be analyzed retrospectively and the correlation with the images to 3 months or 1 year of relapsing patients will be analyzed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2 parametric PET (one at the inclusion and one at 42 gray of the beginning of radiotherapy)
Time frame: one year
Comparison between parametric Imaging and standard Imaging in PET for the diagnosis of recurrence
Time frame: one year
Determinate a method of analysis of the quantification of the parametric imaging
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluate the predictive value of the technique of parametric Imaging on the recurrence-free survival at 3 months
Centre Henri Becquerel
Other
Study of the Interest of the Parametric Imaging in Positron Emission Tomography on the Recurrence Prognosis at One Year in Patient With Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Acronym: PARAPET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05375994
Advanced Cancer, Bronchial Neoplasms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04939324
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Limoges, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04262856
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03177291
Advanced Cancer, Bronchial Neoplasms
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial Details