Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT00798070

Panther: A Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored EC-T Versus Three Weekly FEC-T in Breast Cancer Patients

This is an adjuvant, open, prospective, randomized study to compare:

A. Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin + cyclophosphamide followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (dtEC→dtT) given every second week, to

B. Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil, followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (FEC→T).

Patients with primary node-positive or high risk lymph node negative breast cancer will be eligible for the study.

The primary objective of the phase 3 study is to compare breast cancer relapse-free survival (BCRFS) between the dtEC→dtT and FE100C→T. To detect a five-year BCRFS difference of 0.710 to 0.790 about 1000 patients per arm will be needed. They will be recruited during four years and followed another two years for breast cancer events.

Secondary objectives are to compare

1. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) 2. Event-free survival and 3. Overall survival 4. Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC 5. Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns

1. RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm 2. RFS with receptor positive disease (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as continuous variables) in the comparison between the A- and B- arms. 3. RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs and also analyzed as a continuous variable, or centrally analyzed), in the comparison between the A- and B-arms. 4. RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status (analyzed in the local laboratories as described in the CRFs) in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently. 5. RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers (e.g. gene expression profiling/ sequencing) in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA (related to toxicities for EC/FEC and docetaxel components, respectively, and given dose levels and outcome in relation to these factors and in relation QoL) to outcome per arm. 6. RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.

Tumour tissue will be obtained and stored for studies of prognostication and therapy prediction.

Last patient randomized was September 2011.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Breast Cancer Breast Diseases Breast Neoplasms Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Skin Diseases Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

MUG - Med. Univ.-Klinik Graz, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Are described under the heading "Outcome measures"

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histological proven invasive primary breast cancer, with at least 5 (recommended 10) removed axillary lymph nodes OR negative sentinel node biopsy performed for the node negative cohort. Interval between definitive surgery that includes axillary lymph node dissection and registration must be less than 60 days. Paraffin block from the primary tumour must be retained (not mandatory for Austrian sites). Frozen tumour tissue is strongly recommended to be stored.
  • Receptor negative or positive tumours with 1 or more positive axillary lymph nodes (more than 0.2 mm) OR axillary node negative breast cancers if the primary tumour is larger than 20 mm and receptor negative (Er and Pgr with no receptor content) and being Elston grade III. In Germany high risk node negative breast cancer patients are not eligible until labelling for docetaxel includes node-negative disease.
  • A primary breast cancer patient being 35 years or younger considered suitable for adjuvant chemotherapy (may be receptor negative or positive, HER-2/neu negative or positive, with or without axillary lymph node metastases).
  • Macroscopically and microscopically free margins after radical surgery (no cancer cells at borders of resection).
  • No proven distant metastases (negative chest/pulmonary X-ray, bone scintigram (when clinical signs of skeletal metastases or elevated ALP) supplemented with normal conventional X-ray of hot spots, normal liver function test and haematological function tests; when abnormal values, CT or ultrasound of the liver, patient can be included if no metastases are demonstrated.
  • Female age 18-65.
  • Ambulant patients (ECOG 1 or less).
  • No major cardiovascular morbidity NYHA I or II. (Appendix 3).
  • Written informed consent according to the local ethics committee requirements.
  • Patients of childbearing potential should have a negative pregnancy test within seven days of registration. (In Austria, pregnancy tests have to be repeated monthly during the treatment phase).

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous neo-adjuvant treatment.
  • Non-radical surgery (histopathological positive margins).
  • Proven distant metastases.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Other serious medical condition.
  • Previous or concurrent malignancies at other sites, except basal cell carcinoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the skin or cervix. Patients with previous breast cancer (invasive and/or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the other breast without loco-regional (large lung volumes) radiotherapy, without objective findings for relapse, with > 5 years since diagnosis can be included.
  • Abnormal laboratory values precluding the possibility to safely deliver the used cytotoxic agents in the study.
  • Hypersensitivity to drugs formulated in polysorbate 80.
  • Peripheral neuropathy grade ≥2.

Treatment and study plan

dtEC→dtT

Drug

Individually tailored and two weekly dosed epirubicin (start dose 90mg/m2) + cyclophosphamide (start dose 600mg/m2) followed by a three weeks break followed by biweekly and tailored docetaxel (start dose 75mg/m2) given every second week. If toxicity measured by CTC-NCI criteria are grade 2 or less (except haematological toxicity) it will be possible to escalate doses

Other names: Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Taxotere

FEC→T

Drug

Fixed dosed and three weekly epirubicin (100mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (500mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500mg/m2), followed by fixed dosed and three weekly docetaxel (100mg/m2), no dose escalations.

Other names: Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Fluorouracil, Taxotere

Primary outcomes

  1. Breast cancer relapse-free survival

    Time frame: 2 years

    Breast cancer recurrence free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of the events; local-, regional- or distant breast cancer recurrence or death due to breast cancer or last date of follow-up if no event has occurred. This was defined already in the phase 2 protocol (1 Sept 2004).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Distant disease-free survival

    Time frame: 2 years

    Distant disease free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of distant metastases or death due to breast cancer.

  2. Event-free survival

    Time frame: 2 years

    Event-free survival is defined as time from randomization to the first of the events breast cancer recurrence (any type), contra-lateral breast cancer, other malignancy or any cause of death.

  3. Overall survival

    Time frame: 2 years

    Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to any death.

  4. Health-related quality of life and toxicity analyses according to CTC

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Outcome in relation to tumour biological factors and polymorphism patterns

    Time frame: 2 years

    Comparing arm A vs B regarding:

    • RFS in relation to the Sorlie classes using immunohistochemical markers and/or gene expression profiling comparing A vs B arm;
    • RFS with receptor positive disease in the comparison between the A- and B arms;
    • RFS with high and low proliferation, respectively, in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.;
    • RFS in relation to HER-2/neu status in the primary cancers in the comparison between the A- and B-arms and analyzed whether trastuzumab was given in sequence or concurrently;
    • RFS analyzed in relation to other molecular markers in the primary cancers and SNPs signatures in normal DNA to outcome per arm;
    • RFS analyzed in relation to tumour associated lymphocytes and Y-box binding protein in the comparison between the A- and B-arms.

    Description of a to e are more detailed in the protocol, shortened here due to space limitation.

  6. BCRFS in arm A in relation to given dose levels

    Time frame: 2 years

    Breast cancer relapse free survival

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Karolinska University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group
  • GBG Forschungs GmbH
  • Swedish Breast Cancer Group

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Phase 3 Study Comparing Biweekly and Tailored Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed by Biweekly Tailored Docetaxel Versus Three Weekly Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide + 5-fluorouracil Followed by Docetaxel in Lymph Node Positive or High Risk Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Acronym: PANTHER

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2028
First posted
Nov 25, 2008
Registry last updated
Dec 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.