Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07441824

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

In this multicenter, double blinded, placebo-controlled, 1:1 parallel group RCT, the investigators propose to evaluate the impact of pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy on patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators will include patients of 18-60yrs age and both genders with >50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of body weight.

The primary outcome measure is percent change in body weight at 3 months after enrolment. The intervention will include pancreatic enzyme consisting of 25000 IU of lipase and similar appearing placebo.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Acute pancreatitis (AP), an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas, is mild and self-limiting in most patients. Around 10-20% of AP patients develop acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) which is characterized by destruction of both pancreatic and peripancreatic tissue and is associated with high rate of morbidity and mortality due to both local and systemic complications.

Early recognition and close monitoring of affected patients is crucial. Treatment consists of goal-directed intravenous fluid resuscitation, pain control, and enteral nutrition as early as possible. While sterile necrosis might resolve with above conservative measures, infected necrosis requires antibiotics and further interventions such as percutaneous drainage, minimally invasive surgeries, and endoscopic necrosectomy.

In ANP patients there is direct destruction of acinar tissue that results in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI). In PEI there is insufficient secretion of pancreatic enzymes that causes inadequate nutrient digestion and absorption resulting in weight loss, malnutrition, metabolic bone disease and fat-soluble vitamins and mineral deficiencies. The risk of PEI after ANP is about 25% over 3 years. According to two meta-analysis, PEI was found to be more prevalent during the index AP episode and it remained persistent in about half of the study population at follow-ups. They also reported that the risk of developing PEI is more in those with alcoholic etiology and severe and necrotizing pancreatitis. Hence, management of PEI following ANP is important to improve nutritional status and quality of life. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is the mainstay of treatment for PEI. While the use of PERT is well-established in chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in patients with ANP is still unclear. Hence, in this study, the investigators aim to provide insights into the potential benefits of enzyme supplementation in patients with ANP by evaluating nutritional status, clinical outcomes, and quality of life.

This is a multicenter, double blinded, placebo-controlled, 1:1 parallel group RCT, the investigators propose to evaluate the impact of pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy on patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP). The investigators will include patients of 18-60yrs age and both genders with >50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of body weight.

The primary outcome measure is percent change in body weight at 3 months after enrolment. The intervention will include pancreatic enzyme consisting of 25000 IU of lipase and similar appearing placebo.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with AP according to the Revised Atlanta Classification diagnostic criteria
  • Index episode of acute pancreatitis with more than 50% pancreatic parenchymal necrosis and at least 5% loss of pre pancreatitis body weight at the time of screening
  • Within 6 weeks of onset of disease
  • Able to take food orally
  • Age 18-60 years
  • Both genders

Exclusion criteria

  • Underlying chronic pancreatitis
  • Recurrent acute pancreatitis
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Patients being discharged with NJ tubes
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Inability to give informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Pancreatic enzyme capsules

Drug

Enteric coated pancreatic enzyme

Placebo

Drug

Similar appearing glucose capsules

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent change in body weight

    Time frame: 3 months

    Body weight (in kg) will be measured at baseline and again at 3 months follow-up, and the difference between the two time points will be used to assess the effect of the intervention on patients' weight status. The change will be expressed as percent change of weight 3 months compared to baseline weight.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    Time frame: 3 months

    Quality of life will be assessed by the Short Form (SF)-36 tool. This is a standardised and validated questionnaire based scoring tool that contains 36 questions dealing with 8 domains of quality of life.

    The lowest score in this tool is 0 and the highest score is 100, a higher score indicating better quality of life.

  2. Change in pancreatic exocrine function

    Time frame: 3 months

    Exocrine function will be assessed by the Fecal elastase test and will be expressed as microgram of elastase per gram of stool. Higher value indicates better exocrine function. The cut-off value that will be used is 200mcg/gm elastase, below which exocrine insufficiency will be considered to be present.

  3. Change in nutritional status: Subjective Global Assesment (SGA)

    Time frame: 3 months

    This is a semiquantitative questionnaire based nutritional assessment tool which classifies the nutritional status as SGA A (normal nutrition), SGA B (mild/moderate malnutrition) and SGC C (severe malnutrition)

  4. Change in nuritional status: Anthropometry

    Time frame: 3 months

    Skin fold thickness (in mm) over the triceps muscle at the mid arm level.

  5. Change in nutritional change: Anthropometry

    Time frame: 3 months

    Mid-arm circumference (MAC) in cm.

  6. Change in nutritional status: Anthropometry

    Time frame: 3 months

    Mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MAMC) in cm.

  7. Change in nutritional status: Anthropomentry

    Time frame: 3 months

    Mid-arm muscle area (MAMA) in cm square.

  8. Change in nutritional status: Biochemical assessment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Hemoglobin in gm/dL

  9. Change in nutritional status: Biochemical assessment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Serum prealbumin in mg/dL

  10. Change in nutritional status: Biochemical assessment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Vitamin D

  11. Change in nutritional status: Biochemical assessment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Vitamin B12

  12. Change in the endocrine status

    Time frame: 3 months

    Fasting blood glucose (FBS)

  13. Change in the endocrine status

    Time frame: 3 months

    HbA1c

  14. Change in the endocrine status

    Time frame: 3 months

    Stimulated C-peptide

  15. Change in patient's impression of change after treatment

    Time frame: 3 months

    This will be evaluated using the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC). The score ranges from 1-7, with a score of 1 indicating very much improved and 7 indicating very much worse

  16. Readmission after onset of treatment

    Time frame: 3 months

    Readmission to hospital

Other outcomes

  1. Change in body composition (Bioimpedence analysis): Body fat mass (kg)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Total body fat will be assessed using Bioimpedence analysis (BIA) This is a non-invasive method that operates by sending a low-level, imperceptible electrical current through the body. The normal range is 10-20kg.

  2. Change in body composition (Bioimpedence analysis): Skeletal muscle mass (kg)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Skeletal muscle mass will be assessed using Bioimpedence analysis (BIA) This is a non-invasive method that operates by sending a low-level, imperceptible electrical current through the body.

  3. Change in body composition (Bioimpedence analysis): Total body water (litres)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Total body water will be quantified using Bioimpedence analysis (BIA) This is a non-invasive method that operates by sending a low-level, imperceptible electrical current through the body.

  4. Change in body composition (Bioimpedence analysis): Phase angle at 50kH (degrees)

    Time frame: 3 months

    Cell membrane integrity will be assessed using the phase angle function of Bioimpedence analysis (BIA) This is a non-invasive method that operates by sending a low-level, imperceptible electrical current through the body.

  5. Change in body composition (Bioimpedence analysis): Visceral fat level (numerical unit; normal range (1-12).

    Time frame: 3 months

    Visceral fat level will be assessed using Bioimpedence analysis (BIA) This is a non-invasive method that operates by sending a low-level, imperceptible electrical current through the body. The normal range is from 1-12, a loser value indicating lower visceral fat and higher value indicates larger visceral fat.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Abdul Rasheed, PharmD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+919652104726

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Patients With Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Double Blinded Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial

Acronym: PERiANP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
Registry last updated
May 5, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.