Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03280303

Palbociclib in Real World Practice

This Non-Interventional Study will describe and analyze the clinical use of palbociclib in routine clinical practice in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Burnaby Hospital Cancer Centre, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the breast with evidence of metastatic disease or advanced disease not amenable to treatment with curative intent.
  • Documented HR+ (ER+ and/or PR+) tumor based on local standards.
  • Documented HER2- tumor based on local standards.
  • Physician has determined that treatment with palbociclib is indicated.
  • Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
  • Patients who in the opinion of the investigator are willing and able to comply with regular clinic visits as per standard of care practice at the site.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months at the time of ABC diagnosis, per the investigator's judgment.
  • Patients participating in any interventional clinical trial that includes investigational or marketed products at the time of enrollment. (Patients participating in other investigator initiated research or NIS can be included as long as their standard of care is not altered by the study).
  • Patients on active treatment for malignancies other than ABC at the time of enrollment.
  • Patients who are unable to understand the nature of the study and are unwilling to sign an informed consent.

-

Treatment and study plan

Non-Interventional

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants According to Real-World Tumor Response

    Time frame: From start of palbociclib combination treatment until first documentation of progression (up to approximately 3 years)

    Real world tumor response included complete response (CR), Partial response (PR), Stable disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), and was determined by physician based on imaging, biopsies, biomarkers, and/or clinical judgment. Response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria may not be available for all participants. rwTR was derived as the best tumor response recorded from the palbociclib combination treatment start date until the first documentation of progressive disease. Only response assessments recorded on or before the start date of next subsequent line of treatment will be considered.

  2. Real-World Tumor Response Rate

    Time frame: From start of palbociclib combination treatment until first documentation of progression (up to approximately 3 years)

    Real world tumor response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best tumor response of complete response or partial response. Tumor response was determined by physician based on imaging, biopsies, biomarkers, and/or clinical judgment. RECIST criteria may not be available for all participants.

  3. Real World Progression Free Survival

    Time frame: From initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to the earliest of clinician-documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (up to approximately 3 years)

    Real world progression free survival was defined as time (months) from initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to the earliest of clinician-documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants without documented disease progression or death were censored at the last date of response assessment.

  4. Overall Survival

    Time frame: From initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to death due to any cause or censored, (up to approximately 3 years)

    Overall survival was defined as time from initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants without a documented death were censored at last available visit date known to be alive.

  5. Absolute Eastern Co-Operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  6. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 1

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  7. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 2

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  8. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 3

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  9. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 6

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  10. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 9

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  11. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 12

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  12. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 15

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  13. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 18

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  14. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 21

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  15. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 24

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  16. ECOG Performance Status Scores in Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 27

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  17. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 30

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  18. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 33

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  19. ECOG Performance Status Scores in Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 36

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  20. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 39

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  21. ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 42

    ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

  22. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  23. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 1

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  24. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 2

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  25. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 3

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  26. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 6

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  27. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 9

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  28. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 12

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  29. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 15

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  30. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 18

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  31. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 21

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  32. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 24

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  33. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 27

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  34. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 30

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  35. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 33

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  36. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 36

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  37. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than 70 or Equal to Years Only

    Time frame: Month 39

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  38. Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 42

    The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

  39. Change From Baseline to Month 6 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 6

    European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30: 30 item questionnaires composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

  40. Change From Baseline to Month 12 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 12

    EORTC QLQ-C30: 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

  41. Change From Baseline to Month 18 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 18

    EORTC QLQ-C30: 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

  42. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Baseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participant.

  43. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 1

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  44. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 2

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  45. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 3

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  46. Activities of Daily Living Scores Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 6

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  47. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 9

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  48. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 12

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  49. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 15

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  50. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 18

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participant.

  51. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 21

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  52. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 24

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  53. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 27

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  54. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 30

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  55. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 33

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  56. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 36

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  57. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 39

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  58. Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years Only

    Time frame: Month 42

    Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

  59. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: From start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years)

    An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in administered medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage.

  60. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: From start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years).

    A serious adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product (including pediatric formulas) at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

  61. Number of Participants With Any Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities

    Time frame: From start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years).

    Following lab parameters were assessed Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Lymphocyte count decreased, Lymphocyte count increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, Leukocyte count decreased, Leukocyte count increased, Number of participants with any lab abnormality was reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

POLARIS: PALBOCICLIB IN HORMONE RECEPTOR POSITIVE ADVANCED BREAST CANCER: A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Sep 12, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.