University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Amie Armstrong
CONTACT
Andrea Spiker, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sandip Biswal, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07066709
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the hips of people who undergo revision hip arthroscopy look different from the hips of people whose hip pain is resolved with the first hip arthroscopy and of people who choose the steroid injection for pain management.
Participants will complete one PET/MRI scan.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Amie Armstrong
CONTACT
Andrea Spiker, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sandip Biswal, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Hip arthroscopy utilization has increased significantly and, as such, people are now dealing with an increase in hip arthroscopy failures. In many cases, a failed hip arthroscopy is treated with a revision hip arthroscopy versus conversion to a total hip replacement, but these procedures may not adequately address the etiology of hip pain in the setting of a failed hip arthroscopy. Physicians need better diagnostic tools to appropriately diagnose post- hip arthroscopy hip pain, so that they can offer the appropriate treatment. The advent of FDG PET/MRI offers a highly sensitive imaging method that detects areas of abnormal inflammation. The sensitivity of this method exceeds that of other imaging modalities (e.g., MRI alone) and gives physicians the best possible chance of detecting abnormal inflammatory or hypermetabolic pathology. The ability to better diagnose pain sources around the articular joint with this unique approach has not yet been explored in the post-arthroscopic hip.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will undergo an FDG PET/MRI
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Images will be taken using FDG PET/MRI to identify the number of lesions in the hip.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Images will be taken using FDG PET/MRI to identify the size of the lesions in the hip.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Images will be taken using FDG PET/MRI to identify the location of the lesions in the hip.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Participants will self-report pain level of 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
Global Health is a participant-reported outcome measure that assesses an individual's overall physical and mental health, including their perceptions of general health. It comprises 10 items, with four items assessing Global Physical Health and four assessing Global Mental Health, all based on five core PROMIS domains: physical function, pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and social health. The scores, ranging from 0 to 20, represent the individual's perception of their health, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
The HOS is interpreted by evaluating scores on two subscales: Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports. Each subscale is scored out of 100, with higher scores indicating better function. A score of 100 means no difficulty, while 0 indicates significant issues.
Each item within the subscales is scored on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 means "unable to do" and 4 means "no difficulty." The individual item scores are summed and then converted to a 0-100 scale.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
The mHHS is interpreted based on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better hip function. Scores below 70 are considered poor, 70-79 fair, 80-89 good, and 90-100 excellent. The mHHS focuses on patient-reported pain and function.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
The iHOT is a questionnaire used to assess participant-reported outcomes related to hip conditions. It evaluates various aspects of hip health, including symptoms, functional limitations, sports and recreational activities, and social/emotional well-being. Higher scores on the iHOT generally indicate better hip function and quality of life. The iHOT-33 has 33 questions, each scored on a 100-point visual analog scale, with 0 representing the worst possible quality of life and 100 representing the best.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
Identifying and Managing Pain Generators in Patients With Persistent Post-hip Arthroscopy Pain Using FDG PET/MRI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.