Hong ji HEE
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05487313
The primary endpoint of this study was to identify if the ESPB in the patients of cervical radiculopathy has the effect of pain relief. The secondary endpoint of this study was to identify the spread level in the craniocaudal direction when performed at the T2 level.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
The ESPB requires ultrasound guidance which enables visible local anesthetic spread underneath the erector spinae muscles. The spinalis, longissimus thoracis, and iliocostalis muscles comprise the ES muscles, which run vertically along both sides of the vertebral column from the sacrum up to the skull base (1,10). The ESPB can be performed in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. Among them, upper or mid thoracic ESPB has been used more widely compared to cervical and lumbar regions.
Previous cadaveric studies on the ESPB at the T5 level using computed tomography (CT) reconstruction or direct dissection demonstrated the extensive craniocaudal distribution of methylene blue ranging from T1 to T8 vertebral segments deep to the ES muscles and variable involvement of epidural, paravertebral, and intercostal spaces. The ESPB performed at the T2 level of the cadaver demonstrated an injected dye distribution ranging from C4 to T10. Also, 36% of cadavers showed the spread of an injected dye to the ventral, dorsal ramus, paravertebral space, and even the contralateral side.
The exact mechanism of action of ESPB remains unclear. A recent study suggested that the analgesic effect of ESPB could be obtained by blocking the ventral and dorsal ramus of the spinal nerves by passing through the costotransverse foramen. However, in clinical practice, we can encounter highly variable clinical outcomes or sensory block after the ESPB. The study of the physical spread of the injected agent can be used to predict the clinical result and elucidate the possible mechanism of action of ESPB.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
fascial plane injection guided by fluoroscopic device after ultrasound guidance
Time frame: baseline, 10 minutes after ESPB, 1 week after ESPB, 2 weeks after ESPB, 4 weeks after ESPB, 8 weeks after ESPB
numerical rating scale changes after T2 ESPB among 5 times period
Time frame: baseline, 8 weeks after ESPB
Neck disability scale changes after T2 ESPB among 2 times period
Time frame: baseline, 1 minute after erector spinae plane block
fluoroscopic contrast medium spread level in the cranio-caudal direction
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Other
Comparison of Pain Relief During High Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Different Volumes of Local Anesthetics
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06062108
Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
Draguignan, Var, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04629963
Chronic Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06114264
Back Pain, Behavior
Granada, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03106740
Back Ache, Back Pain
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details